Pacquiao took PEDS and is a cheat = FACT

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Redd Foxx
    Hittin' the heavy bag.
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Dec 2011
    • 22007
    • 1,180
    • 2,316
    • 1,257,197

    #141
    I think the OP is generally a great poster but I gotta be honest, the premise of this thread is weak as *** and only hurts his credibility. This is as low quality as something Spoon or Maxi would post.

    Comment

    • Robbie Barrett
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Nov 2013
      • 40891
      • 2,779
      • 667
      • 570,921

      #142
      Originally posted by WesternChamp
      he admitted to using steroids? he's been accused of peds since 2009. Add that up.
      He admitted using PEDs in the past. He turned down the biggest fight in history over random testing in 2009. It's pretty obvious why.

      He's a PED cheat. That's fact now.

      Comment

      • hugh grant
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Apr 2006
        • 30544
        • 2,201
        • 925
        • 105,596

        #143
        Some still threatened by PAC even though he's koed by jmm and lost on paper to Floyd.
        Too right they should be threatened by best of era

        Comment

        • Robbie Barrett
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Nov 2013
          • 40891
          • 2,779
          • 667
          • 570,921

          #144
          Originally posted by hugh grant
          Some still threatened by PAC even though he's koed by jmm and lost on paper to Floyd.
          Too right they should be threatened by best of era
          Threatened?

          Just keep seeing Pac Fans accusing others. When it's a fact Pacquiao is a PED cheat.

          Comment

          • WesternChamp
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Oct 2015
            • 14561
            • 239
            • 73
            • 20,277

            #145
            Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
            He admitted using PEDs in the past. He turned down the biggest fight in history over random testing in 2009. It's pretty obvious why.

            He's a PED cheat. That's fact now.
            he never admitted to using peds. he said he's smoke meth when he was a teen but stopped when he realized it wasnt good for the body, this was in 2016-2017. he's been accused of using peds since 2009. floyd is still smoking weed.

            Comment

            • Robbie Barrett
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Nov 2013
              • 40891
              • 2,779
              • 667
              • 570,921

              #146
              Originally posted by WesternChamp
              he never admitted to using peds. he said he's smoke meth when he was a teen but stopped when he realized it wasnt good for the body, this was in 2016-2017. he's been accused of using peds since 2009. floyd is still smoking weed.
              Amphetamines are classed as PEDs.

              Comment

              • WesternChamp
                Banned
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Oct 2015
                • 14561
                • 239
                • 73
                • 20,277

                #147
                Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                Threatened?

                Just keep seeing Pac Fans accusing others. When it's a fact Pacquiao is a PED cheat.
                accused? how so? he's endorsing it!

                [/QUOTE]



                [/QUOTE]

                Comment

                • Robbie Barrett
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Nov 2013
                  • 40891
                  • 2,779
                  • 667
                  • 570,921

                  #148
                  The amphetamines can enhance athletic performance. That much seems clear from the literature, some of which is reviewed here. Increases in endurance have been demonstrated in both humans and ****. Smith and Beecher, 20 years ago, showed improvement of running, swimming, and weight throwing in highly trained athletes. Laboratory analogs of such performances have also been used and similar enhancement demonstrated. The amount of change induced by the amphetamines is usually small, of the order of a few percent. Nevertheless, since a fraction of a percent improvement can make the difference between fame and oblivion, the margin conferred by these drugs can be quite important.

                  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7286248

                  Comment

                  • WesternChamp
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Oct 2015
                    • 14561
                    • 239
                    • 73
                    • 20,277

                    #149
                    Originally posted by Robbie Barrett
                    The amphetamines can enhance athletic performance. That much seems clear from the literature, some of which is reviewed here. Increases in endurance have been demonstrated in both humans and ****. Smith and Beecher, 20 years ago, showed improvement of running, swimming, and weight throwing in highly trained athletes. Laboratory analogs of such performances have also been used and similar enhancement demonstrated. The amount of change induced by the amphetamines is usually small, of the order of a few percent. Nevertheless, since a fraction of a percent improvement can make the difference between fame and oblivion, the margin conferred by these drugs can be quite important.

                    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7286248
                    Cannabis is considered to be in violation of all three main disqualifying criteria. It violates the first (performance enhancement) because of its ability to decrease anxiety and fear, and potentially to improve some types of oxygenation and concentration. It violates the second (health risk) because it can result in, among other things, "decreased cognitive performance" and "pulmonary toxicity." It violates the third (spirit of sport) because of the drug's widespread illegality and conflicts with the "role model of athletes in modern society," along with "negative reactions by the public, sponsors, and the media."

                    On Monday, American judo competitor Nick Delpopolo was expelled from the Olympics for doping with cannabis. (He says he accidentally ate a pot brownie.) The key word here is "doping"--if the situation were different, Delpopolo might just have been "using." Cannabis is on the Prohibited List, a catalogue of banned drugs maintained by the World Anti-Doping Agency, or WADA. Test positive for a drug on WADA's list? You're doping, and face dismissal from the Games. Test positive for anything else, even if it's illegal? No worries--you're free to compete. This is one powerful list. But why is cannabis, the users of which are not necessarily renowned for their athletic ability, on it?

                    Comment

                    • WesternChamp
                      Banned
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Oct 2015
                      • 14561
                      • 239
                      • 73
                      • 20,277

                      #150
                      this explains why floyd has no fear of conor and is talking about going to war.

                      Cannabis is considered to be in violation of all three main disqualifying criteria. It violates the first (performance enhancement) because of its ability to decrease anxiety and fear, and potentially to improve some types of oxygenation and concentration. It violates the second (health risk) because it can result in, among other things, "decreased cognitive performance" and "pulmonary toxicity." It violates the third (spirit of sport) because of the drug's widespread illegality and conflicts with the "role model of athletes in modern society," along with "negative reactions by the public, sponsors, and the media."

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP