[PHOTO!!] WOW MATHEMATICALLY, MCGREGOR has 95% CHANCE to KO FLOYD within 2 ROUNDS!!!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • The Problem Child
    Machines break, I don't.
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Oct 2013
    • 16960
    • 1,008
    • 480
    • 67,053

    #1

    [PHOTO!!] WOW MATHEMATICALLY, MCGREGOR has 95% CHANCE to KO FLOYD within 2 ROUNDS!!!

    I was doing some math using physics formulas and stats and came up with this



    I dont want to get into all the details but the result was

    95%

    EDIT: before all the idiots question me, I took physics and statistics in college
  • eco1
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Nov 2015
    • 9950
    • 1,715
    • 8,550
    • 71,221

    #2
    I hate the G@Y one, but after the kills Conor, will you leave the forum?

    Comment

    • ironmt
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Sep 2006
      • 3409
      • 153
      • 81
      • 10,887

      #3
      lol, another hilarious post. You are on a roll GGG. After recalculating the formula I came up with 98%. I will have to try again.

      Comment

      • *TonyMontana*
        Scarface
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2016
        • 9006
        • 437
        • 588
        • 41,366

        #4
        Originally posted by G G G
        I was doing some math using physics formulas and stats and came up with this



        I dont want to get into all the details but the result was

        95%

        EDIT: before all the idiots question me, I took physics and statistics in college

        I'm Gunna miss this dude after saturday

        Comment

        • The Problem Child
          Machines break, I don't.
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Oct 2013
          • 16960
          • 1,008
          • 480
          • 67,053

          #5
          Originally posted by ironmt
          lol, another hilarious post. You are on a roll GGG. After recalculating the formula I came up with 98%. I will have to try again.
          Originally posted by *TonyMontana*

          I'm Gunna miss this dude after saturday
          NO JOKE here lol this is all science. I'm not going ANYWHERE. I will be Sunday morning with a new avy and siggy.

          Comment

          • nixxter
            Contender
            Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
            • May 2017
            • 305
            • 98
            • 72
            • 18,136

            #6
            ****, Floyd is in trouble! Good that he cannot read.

            Comment

            • ray moe
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jun 2017
              • 360
              • 17
              • 4
              • 6,615

              #7
              k is used for constants. And laplacian of a constant is 0,the same goes for the second derivate of a constant, is 0 too. So, since the first line, the laplacian of a constant + the second derivate of another constant = 0.

              Yes, your formula is ok, he has 0 chances. You just got lost in your way to resolve it.

              Comment

              • mathed
                molṑn labé
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Feb 2009
                • 54549
                • 2,741
                • 2,984
                • 224,675

                #8
                Originally posted by G G G
                I was doing some math using physics formulas and stats and came up with this



                I dont want to get into all the details but the result was

                95%

                EDIT: before all the idiots question me, I took physics and statistics in college
                A lot of vibrational analysis going on there, the resonant frequency is the dominant force in a system with a small dampening coefficient.

                Comment

                • SonnyboyReturns
                  Interim Champion
                  Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 695
                  • 81
                  • 55
                  • 8,630

                  #9
                  95% squared Bwahahahahahaha

                  Comment

                  • SN!PER
                    locked and loaded
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 23139
                    • 1,204
                    • 769
                    • 107,506

                    #10
                    Always square the circles, round up, and remember the bell curve when calculating boxing.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP