I think we can all agree Loma..

**Hennessy** · 08-19-2017, 10:17 AM

At this point I have to give Loma the edge because of Rigo's age and inactivity, Especially at a higher weight class.
I still think its a great fight for purists and will be competitive obviously

**Jimmy 23** · 08-19-2017, 11:14 AM

Originally posted by 1g5a22

KTFO of Rigondeaux. Yes?

Nope you dumb f#ck

**1g5a22** · 08-19-2017, 11:39 AM

Originally posted by Jimmy 23

Nope you dumb f#ck

Yes my love.

**jinkazama555** · 08-19-2017, 01:13 PM

yes, that's kinda obvious

not sure that rigo will have enough balls to actually step up and do something to arrange the fight except stalking egis klimas in twitter

**1g5a22** · 08-19-2017, 01:18 PM

Bloke's, any one fancy squatting over my face and dipping there black eggs in my mouth?

**!! Shawn** · 08-19-2017, 01:22 PM

Originally posted by 1g5a22

KTFO of Rigondeaux. Yes?

It could happen, depends on the weight. Also depends on where Rigondeaux is at right now.

If Rigondeaux is still on his A game, No.

If Rigondeaux has lost a few steps at 37, maybe.

Rigondeaux has shown throughout his short career that he fights up to the level of his opponent. He wont extend himself to showcase his skills he is in with someone who forces him too.

We also need to see the actual size difference.

Boxrec has Lomachenko's reach listed at 65" and Rigondeaux's at 68" if that is indeed true, then Rigondeaux will have a much easier time dealing with the size difference.

Also, Lomachenko's greatest asset is his footwork. Rigondeaux is every bit his equal in that category.

I think we can all agree Loma..