Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua Admits He Felt Massive Disappointment Klitschko Retired

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
    Legends arent skills,no way Joshua struggles with Grant and guys like Bobby chyz.among others they have..lack of competition?Well mike Tyson was accused of that also ,the hard truth was he was that good at one point.

    Joshua will be no different,its the very reason you posted so you are contradicting yourself stating lack of competition ,its the reason why hes not getting credit and your doing the same thing now? lol,isnt that why you posted bc hes not getting credit and thats why bc fans cant seem to actually see real legit superior skills here? lol
    You should read better . I'm not saying he is never going to be a legend or anything like that , just not now at this moment and saying that Legends are not skills ? seriously ? you lost every argument you could make by just saying that. sad .

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by leeayon View Post
      You should read better . I'm not saying he is never going to be a legend or anything like that , just not now at this moment and saying that Legends are not skills ? seriously ? you lost every argument you could make by just saying that. sad .
      I dont have to read better bc i didnt bring up legend status just skills.Legend is not a skill....where did you ever see the word LEGEND on someones breakdown of a fight and what would a legend skills be?Its a word not a skill,maybe in bizarro world not on this one...lol

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
        I dont have to read better bc i didnt bring up legend status just skills.Legend is not a skill....where did you ever see the word LEGENd on someones breakdown of a fight and what would a legend skills be?Its a word not a skill...lol
        so a Legend doesn't need skills to became a Legend ..kind hard to understand sorry , anyway I'm not referring to persons that are discrediting Joshua because of lack of competition, I'm referring to the people that think Joshua is still a nobody with no skills and he was lucky against Klitschko.. those are the boxing experts that I dont understand talking with out a true legit reason to think that .

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by leeayon View Post
          so a Legend doesn't need skills to became a Legend ..kind hard to understand sorry , anyway I'm not referring to persons that are discrediting Joshua because of lack of competition, I'm referring to the people that think Joshua is still a nobody with no skills and he was lucky against Klitschko.. those are the boxing experts that I dont understand talking with out a true legit reason to think that .
          Legend is a noun that describes someone or a story.It has nothing to do with boxing skills....

          Billy had lightning fast hands and feet that went from the speed of light that he could time travel.

          Would this sentence describe skills or a story? lol

          Again you already said his competition is weak and are no different than them bc they also use 41 year old Wlad.So you are talking in circles now,how can he get credit when you are saying his era is weak?Makes no sense.

          "He is a good strong champion , not spectacular due to the lack of competition .. but cmon what is else is out there ? Parker ? boring ass Luis Ortiz ? WILDER ??"

          ^^^^

          Who wrote this?It wasnt me!
          Last edited by juggernaut666; 08-18-2017, 07:26 PM.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by juggernaut666 View Post
            Legend is a noun that describes someone or a story.It has nothing to do with boxing skills....

            Billy had lightning fast hands and feet that went from the speed of light that he could time travel.

            Would this sentence describe skills or a story? lol

            Again you already said his competition is weak and are no different than them bc they also use 41 year old Wlad.So you are talking in circles now,how can he get credit when you are saying his era is weak?Makes no sense.

            "He is a good strong champion , not spectacular due to the lack of competition .. but cmon what is else is out there ? Parker ? boring ass Luis Ortiz ? WILDER ??"

            ^^^^

            Who wrote this?It wasnt me!
            Again..learn to read or stop trolling . Joshua is skilled , yes, Is there an argument that the competition so far was weak ? also yes , Is he a good champion? In my personal opinion yes ! . Was 41 Klitscho hes best win ? yes for me .. can he still improve ? absolutely . Is he a nobody that was lucky against a 41 Klitschko ? absolutely not.. this is not going circle this is been REALISTIC .

            Comment


            • #36
              Wlad had nothing to prove and gave a heck of a fight at 41, Wlad knew he could not put the same dedication in the training and give 4months of his time away from home and family.. a man should know when to retire.. take a leaf out of Lennox and Vitali 's books..
              When you are not in need of money, have a HOF career, have achieved everything in a decade span, it is time to call it off.. the man who beat him was deemed as the heir apprentice by Wlad himself.. it's just a shame the fat coke/roided ass hole Furry could not muster enough courage to honor his rematch.. that'll be a tough one to swallow but seeing the Furry today it just seems that Wlad better off being retired than thinking about facing Furry again..

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by leeayon View Post
                Again..learn to read or stop trolling . Joshua is skilled , yes, Is there an argument that the competition so far was weak ? also yes , Is he a good champion? In my personal opinion yes ! . Was 41 Klitscho hes best win ? yes for me .. can he still improve ? absolutely . Is he a nobody that was lucky against a 41 Klitschko ? absolutely not.. this is not going circle this is been REALISTIC .
                You thought LEGENDS was a skill ,you should have just stopped there !

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by BoxingFan85 View Post
                  Wlad had nothing to prove and gave a heck of a fight at 41, Wlad knew he could not put the same dedication in the training and give 4months of his time away from home and family.. a man should know when to retire.. take a leaf out of Lennox and Vitali 's books..
                  When you are not in need of money, have a HOF career, have achieved everything in a decade span, it is time to call it off.. the man who beat him was deemed as the heir apprentice by Wlad himself.. it's just a shame the fat coke/roided ass hole Furry could not muster enough courage to honor his rematch.. that'll be a tough one to swallow but seeing the Furry today it just seems that Wlad better off being retired than thinking about facing Furry again..
                  Had Fury rematched Klitchko we would not have got the better fight ,even though Klitchko knocks Fury out in that rematch .

                  Bashir also said Klitchko should have fought Parker or Wilder and then come back to Joshua bc he had more in him ,just not enough to mentally do a Joshua training camp at the moment he made the decision to retire .

                  I wouldn't favor Klitchko against Joshua ,im also with Bashir when he said Joshua still defeats Klitchko of 2015 bc styles make fights ,he did say they would have always bring out the best in each other at least at this point.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X
                  TOP