PROVE: ie, after canelo, we want that fight absolutely never, thus we'll say he needs to PROVE it to justify our ****ty resume and pretend we're really so great.
Why does Charlo have to "PROVE" himself to fight GGG?
Collapse
-
Can you read, because I said there might be a fight in between which likely would be Golovkin trying to get all the belts. And then maybe there is rematch with Canelo.
The best scenario for Charlo would be a early fight beat down by Golovkin on Canelo. Even then he is still likely targeting the other belt.
So again Charlo needs to fight before then. I don't get why you are being such a wimp and why you don't want to see Charlo fight some other good fighters.Comment
-
That's your dream scenario Amiga.Can you read, because I said there might be a fight in between which likely would be Golovkin trying to get all the belts. And then maybe there is rematch with Canelo.
The best scenario for Charlo would be a early fight beat down by Golovkin on Canelo. Even then he is still likely targeting the other belt.
So again Charlo needs to fight before then. I don't get why you are being such a wimp and why you don't want to see Charlo fight some other good fighters.
GG would rather get stripped than stopped.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Irony is the only title that has MATTERED in the last 30 years is the RING championship (since the sanctioning bodies are all corrupt).
Canelo is currently the champ and GGG is number 1 contender. Charlo is at 10. Work your way up first you have a lot of fighters ahead of you.Last edited by strykr619; 08-17-2017, 05:46 PM.Comment
-
Never advocated such a thing. Is your first language English? Seriously do you have a GED because I'm picking up that you might have a learning disability or two.
So is your position that Charlo shouldn't fight anyone else until Golovkin or Canelo fight him?Comment
-
Comment
Comment