Comments Thread For: Legacies Remain Pristine Even When Champs Go on Too Long

[aboutfkntime]

So with your above provided description of what a prime fighter Is, It was clearly a lie when you claimed Paquiao beat an OLD Marco Antonio Barrera when Barrera was 29 years of age?

Considering Barrera was coming off of the best run of wins In his career against Hamed, Sanchez, Morales, Tapia and Kelley and then went on to beat Ayala, Morales and Juarez after losing to Pacquiao.

If Floyd loses his upcoming fight to Mcgregor you can believe that that one particular fight will be what he Is most remembered for.

what fight will Pacquiao be most remembered for ?

shall I give you a tip ?

Pac should never have messed with Hogan, he was too big

[aboutfkntime]

[aboutfkntime]

[aboutfkntime]

I have no problem giving Floyd the props he deserves as a boxer as he Is a great defensive fighter and was a good offensive fighter In the lower weight classes. I don't like his personality and a lot of It Is nothing more than his attempt to sell fights. You also have to remember Floyd said a lot of things In his career that were nothing but lies and contradictions.

stop crying b1tch

you females get so catty

[aboutfkntime]

hates lies and contradictions

but loves Golovkin

[Schmerzen]

imo floyd is the best fighter after robinson and ali

[ironmt]

what fight will Pacquiao be most remembered for ?

shall I give you a tip ?

Pac should never have messed with Hogan, he was too big

Why didn't you answer my question? Don't you feel pretty ****** now claiming that Pacquiao beat an old Barrera who was 29 years of age coming off of the best wins of his career? While praising Floyd for beating a 36 year old Pacquiao, claiming It was the best win of his career, meanwhile Pacquiao was coming off of the worst fight of his career.

You just are not very Intelligent. It's actually getting way to easy kicking you around.

Again, Since your criteria for greatness Is who you beat with consideration to when and how, what are Floyd's best wins and how many were In their prime?

[aboutfkntime]

Why didn't you answer my question? Don't you feel pretty ****** now claiming that Pacquiao beat an old Barrera who was 29 years of age coming off of the best wins of his career? While praising Floyd for beating a 36 year old Pacquiao, claiming It was the best win of his career, meanwhile Pacquiao was coming off of the worst fight of his career.

You just are not very Intelligent. It's actually getting way to easy kicking you around.

Again, Since your criteria for greatness Is who you beat with consideration to when and how, what are Floyd's best wins and how many were In their prime?

nobody feels ****** talking to you

prime is not defined by age

and btw, I told you Barrera was 33 the last time he fought Pac

he was coming off a loss to the guy who did this.....



you criticize Marquez..... despite the fact that Manny could never distance himself from the Mexican warrior..... and despite the fact that Marquez beat a guy YOU say is Pac's best win

[aboutfkntime]

[j.razor]

I have no problem giving Floyd the props he deserves as a boxer as he Is a great defensive fighter and was a good offensive fighter In the lower weight classes. I don't like his personality and a lot of It Is nothing more than his attempt to sell fights. You also have to remember Floyd said a lot of things In his career that were nothing but lies and contradictions.

His personality seems normal....so what are the "a lot of things In his career that were nothing but lies and contradictions."??