JMM Beat 23yr old Salido 117-111

[1g5a22]

Here's a fact for you: Both JMM & Salido lost there first ever fights! Guess what, fighters get better! Durhhhhhhhhhh....

Dense bastard haha haha haha u thinking u proved anything here loollll

[SilverMiles]

He said a 23 year old JMM dominated the guy Loma lost to...

Actually, he said Marquez beat a 23-year-old Salido and Loma lost to the 32-year-old, former champion Salido.

Marquez was 31.

[chrisJS]

Marquez lost to Norwod, John and some dude called Javier Duran on his debut. He was a great fighter though.

[Dinamita 03]

Marquez lost to Norwod, John and some dude called Javier Duran on his debut. He was a great fighter though.

He lost due to a DQ in his debut for a headbutt. Obviously I've never seen the fight so it's hard to say if it was justified. He's never been known for headbutts so it's hard to imagine it was done deliberately.

Yeah great fighters lose fights, hard to understand for some people. Both were highly controversial, hard to say he deserved those wins though.

[Larry the boss]

Actually, he said Marquez beat a 23-year-old Salido and Loma lost to the 32-year-old, former champion Salido.

Marquez was 31.

[IMG]https://i.*****.com/media/14ceV8wMLIGO6Q/*****.webp[/IMG]

[chrisJS]

He lost due to a DQ in his debut for a headbutt. Obviously I've never seen the fight so it's hard to say if it was justified. He's never been known for headbutts so it's hard to imagine it was done deliberately.

Yeah great fighters lose fights, hard to understand for some people. Both were highly controversial, hard to say he deserved those wins though.

Yeah, I've heard the report from the fight was that he'd already dropped the guy twice and their was an accidental clash of heads but the other dudes manager was connected with the commission or something so they DQ'd him.

John fight I had Marquez 9-3 (with some B.S points deductions), Norwood 115-111 both were bad decisions.

Too many newbies/casuals and fanboys can't grasp a "loss" and think every fighter must be undefeated.

[1g5a22]

-Donaire lost his second pro fight
-Armstrong lost 3 out of his 1st 4
-Arguello lost his 4th bout
-Mayorga lost his 1st
-Hopkins lost his 1st
-Rafael Marquez his 1st
-JMM his 1st
-Salido his 1st
-Dempsey went 6-1-3 in his 1st 10
-Qawi went 1-1-1 in his 1st 3
-Lomachenko his 2nd

[jmrf4435]

23 years old salido was not nearly as good as the version loma fought.

Marquez is more of winer than anything else.

Loma would NEVER lose to a guy like freddie ****CKCING norwood or chris john.

Also, you forget to mention this was lomas like 2nd pro fight against salido

[Lester Tutor]

-Donaire lost his second pro fight
-Armstrong lost 3 out of his 1st 4
-Arguello lost his 4th bout
-Mayorga lost his 1st
-Hopkins lost his 1st
-Rafael Marquez his 1st
-JMM his 1st
-Salido his 1st
-Dempsey went 6-1-3 in his 1st 10
-Qawi went 1-1-1 in his 1st 3
-Lomachenko his 2nd

When Loma fought Salido... this was Salido's record: 41(31)-2-2

Did those boxers' promoters feel their guys should fight against a Salido type in their 2nd pro fight? With that record? You have to have significant circumstances like a pedigree am record and 2 Golds perhaps. Not even Rigo was rushed in like that.

Of course Loma got the special treatment for a 2nd fight, title, you pay the consequences which is realistic. Mexicans are tough boxers...

[Dinamita 03]

Yeah, I've heard the report from the fight was that he'd already dropped the guy twice and their was an accidental clash of heads but the other dudes manager was connected with the commission or something so they DQ'd him.

John fight I had Marquez 9-3 (with some B.S points deductions), Norwood 115-111 both were bad decisions.

Too many newbies/casuals and fanboys can't grasp a "loss" and think every fighter must be undefeated.

Different circumstances as well. If anything Lomachenko benefited from that loss. I think he's admitted that himself.