Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

[WOW!!!THE ARTICLE they DIDN'T WANT YOU TO SEE] MAYWEATHER FAILED 3 PED DRUG TESTS!?!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Divine Hammer View Post
    pac did vada multiple times and come out clean. floyd has his failed tests swept under the rug. no testing b sample after positive a sample tests???? illegal IV use for flushing/masking ped use???? shady
    Even the article says "rumor" can't you read? What's fact is Pacquiao hasn't done VADA in 3 of his last 4 fights.

    Comment


    • #22
      Mayweather extremists, you happy now? You couldn't STFU and let Pac have his moment. You had to shyt on it, now we have a food of garbage like this coming back at you.
      Good job, guys.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by G G G View Post
        #WeWantFloydTestedPublicly #WeWantToSeeLiveStreamOfLabTestResults

        Comment


        • #24
          usada refused to release the documents surrounding floyd's failed tests. shady. suspect. unacceptable.

          why wasn't b sample tested!?!?!?!?!

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
            Mayweather extremists, you happy now? You couldn't STFU and let Pac have his moment. You had to shyt on it, now we have a food of garbage like this coming back at you.
            Good job, guys.
            They never learn lol

            Comment


            • #26
              This is bad.

              Under standard sports drug-testing protocols, when blood or urine is taken from an athlete, it’s divided into an “A” and “B” sample. The “A” sample is tested first. If it tests negative, end of story. If the “A” sample tests positive, the athlete then has the right to demand that the “B” sample be tested. If the “B” sample tests negative, the athlete is presumed to be clean. But if the “B” sample also tests positive, the first positive finding is confirmed and the athlete has a problem.

              On May 20, 2012, a rumor filtered through the drug-testing community that Mayweather had tested positive on three occasions for an illegal performance-enhancing drug.

              More specifically, it was rumored that Mayweather’s “A” sample had tested positive on three occasions and, after each positive test, USADA had found exceptional circumstances in the form of inadvertent use and gave Floyd a waiver. This waiver, according to the rumor, negated the need for a test of Floyd’s “B” sample. And because the “B” sample was never tested, a loophole in USADA’s contract with Mayweather and Golden Boy allowed the testing to proceed without the positive “A” sample results being reported to Mayweather’s opponent or the Nevada State Athletic Commission (which had jurisdiction over the fights).

              In late-May, Pacquiao’s attorneys heard the rumor. On June 4, 2012, they served document demands and subpoenas on Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy and USADA calling for the production of all documents that related to PED testing of Mayweather for the Shane Mosley, Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto fights.

              The documents were not produced. There was a delay in the proceedings while Floyd spent nine weeks in the Clark County Detention Center after pleading guilty to charges of domestic violence and harassment. Upon his release from jail on August 2nd, settlement talks heated up.

              On September 25, 2012, a stipulation of settlement ending the defamation case was filed with the court. The parties agreed that the terms of settlement would be kept confidential. Prior to the agreement being signed, two sources with detailed knowledge of the proceedings told this writer that Mayweather’s initial monetary settlement offer was “substantially more” than Pacquiao’s attorneys had expected it would be and an agreement in principle was reached soon afterward.


              Floyd had to pay to keep those test results from coming out. That's a rap! Cheater.

              Comment


              • #27
                hahahahahahahahahahaaha floyd a joke. usada a joke. says it all. what does floyd have to hide?????? hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm shady.



                Originally posted by Spoon23 View Post
                This is bad.

                Under standard sports drug-testing protocols, when blood or urine is taken from an athlete, it’s divided into an “A” and “B” sample. The “A” sample is tested first. If it tests negative, end of story. If the “A” sample tests positive, the athlete then has the right to demand that the “B” sample be tested. If the “B” sample tests negative, the athlete is presumed to be clean. But if the “B” sample also tests positive, the first positive finding is confirmed and the athlete has a problem.

                On May 20, 2012, a rumor filtered through the drug-testing community that Mayweather had tested positive on three occasions for an illegal performance-enhancing drug.

                More specifically, it was rumored that Mayweather’s “A” sample had tested positive on three occasions and, after each positive test, USADA had found exceptional circumstances in the form of inadvertent use and gave Floyd a waiver. This waiver, according to the rumor, negated the need for a test of Floyd’s “B” sample. And because the “B” sample was never tested, a loophole in USADA’s contract with Mayweather and Golden Boy allowed the testing to proceed without the positive “A” sample results being reported to Mayweather’s opponent or the Nevada State Athletic Commission (which had jurisdiction over the fights).

                In late-May, Pacquiao’s attorneys heard the rumor. On June 4, 2012, they served document demands and subpoenas on Mayweather, Mayweather Promotions, Golden Boy and USADA calling for the production of all documents that related to PED testing of Mayweather for the Shane Mosley, Victor Ortiz and Miguel Cotto fights.

                The documents were not produced. There was a delay in the proceedings while Floyd spent nine weeks in the Clark County Detention Center after pleading guilty to charges of domestic violence and harassment. Upon his release from jail on August 2nd, settlement talks heated up.

                On September 25, 2012, a stipulation of settlement ending the defamation case was filed with the court. The parties agreed that the terms of settlement would be kept confidential. Prior to the agreement being signed, two sources with detailed knowledge of the proceedings told this writer that Mayweather’s initial monetary settlement offer was “substantially more” than Pacquiao’s attorneys had expected it would be and an agreement in principle was reached soon afterward.


                Floyd had to pay to keep those test results from coming out. That's a rap! Cheater.

                Comment


                • #28
                  I remember that USADA "exposed" Lance Armstrong only after his own team mates did it...

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by MDPopescu View Post
                    I remember that USADA "exposed" Lance Armstrong only after his own team mates did it...
                    that was the advent and art of EPO use. EPO research use wasn't around when Lance was slanging that. It was such a huge scandal they re-examined the sampled research and cross checked it with EPO gain

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Floyd getting TUE’s after being caught was a thing before 2015?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP