Jeff horn vs Manny pacman rematch November

[Josh knight]

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/...79d786ed2b1070

I firmly believe Hornet will win this and not cause of 'corrupt' judges. . Even though the first fight was rescored with Hornet winning again. The hornet is in his prime right now. Manny is not taking the game seriously being a senator. If your going to be a pro boxer you need to invest all your time and energy into it. Manny is aging to. Here is a little plug of my sons interview with Michael Jacksons ghost

https://*************/watch?v=PGYoOya0l70

[Lester Tutor]

http://www.couriermail.com.au/sport/...79d786ed2b1070

I firmly believe Hornet will win this and not cause of 'corrupt' judges. . Even though the first fight was rescored with Hornet winning again. The hornet is in his prime right now. Manny is not taking the game seriously being a senator. If your going to be a pro boxer you need to invest all your time and energy into it. Manny is aging to. Here is a little plug of my sons interview with Michael Jacksons ghost

https://*************/watch?v=PGYoOya0l70

Advice, don't post personal related videos of family mate. your son's image shouldn't be tainted with PAC vs Horn related news...

[boliodogs]

I think Horn lost the first fight by many points even with a referee who allowed him to fight as dirty and illegal a fight as I can remember without so much as a warning. The computerbox guys just count punches thrown and landed and don't care who lands the most punches. They had Pacquiao landing twice as many punches as Horn. They had Pacquiao landing more punches in almost every round. Pacquiao battered Horn the entire 9th round and should have been awarded a 10-8 round in the 9th. That's not a Horn win unless he was awarded extra points for headlocks, headbutts, holding and hitting, mauling and chock holds.The corrupt judges scored the fight wrong the first time. The judges who rescored the fight were no doubt told to score it for Horn so the did as they were told. A prime Horn is a very mediocre boxer. Even an old, well past prime, unfocused poorly trained Pacquiao will beat Horn in a rematch with a good referee and 3 good honest judges in my opinion. The vast majority of fans and the boxing writers scored the fight for Pacquiao in every poll I have seen. Do a poll on here on who won and Pacquiao will win again.

[jas]

pac dominates him , horns defense is not as good as pacs

[Thraxox]

In a neutral ground Pac stops him. But if its in Australia again, Horn wins by a robbery.

[Josh knight]

In a neutral ground Pac stops him. But if its in Australia again, Horn wins by a robbery.

It's going to be in Brisbane again. You guys have to remember combox has being proven to be inaccurate. The fight is judged round by round. Pac scored most of his hits in the 9th round. Horn was the busier fighter over the duration of the whole fight. Anyway I think he will win cause in history if a fighter claims he was robbed then in the rematch that fighter usually loses. It happened recently with Ward v kov. Plus fenech vs Nelson. I can list heaps .

[Thraxox]

It's going to be in Brisbane again. You guys have to remember combox has being proven to be inaccurate. The fight is judged round by round. Pac scored most of his hits in the 9th round. Horn was the busier fighter over the duration of the whole fight. Anyway I think he will win cause in history if a fighter claims he was robbed then in the rematch that fighter usually loses. It happened recently with Ward v kov. Plus fenech vs Nelson. I can list heaps .

No, Horn is a dirty fighter that relies on dirty officials to get him have some sort of leverage. He is just a one trick pony that got some limelight because he robbed Pacquiao.

[Elroy The Great]

pac vs timmy 2................bfd