This is a bit of a rhetorical question and also a critique of the modern system. I know promoters and managers have always paid off officials to move their guys up rankings but at least at one stage it meant the best guys were getting themselves into a position to fight the other best guy, leading to becoming a contender and then a title shot. Nowadays we have guys who have lost their previous fight or not fought for years getting titles shots.
Case in point, Lomachenko is about to defend his world "championship" against a guy who has lost his previous fight. There is Stiverne who hasn't had a fight since 2015 or a genuine world level win since ...well ever. And yet he is in line for a shot at Wilder.
The reality is, inactive guys or guys coming off of losses are getting world title shots, not only does that devalue the fight, it devalues the importance of the defended championship.
Case in point, Lomachenko is about to defend his world "championship" against a guy who has lost his previous fight. There is Stiverne who hasn't had a fight since 2015 or a genuine world level win since ...well ever. And yet he is in line for a shot at Wilder.
The reality is, inactive guys or guys coming off of losses are getting world title shots, not only does that devalue the fight, it devalues the importance of the defended championship.
Comment