I thought he took too long to KO such a handicapped boxer who shouldn't have been allowed to fight. I think Canelo or GGG would have KOed the crippled Heiland in the first round. I think Jermall is good but hardly this monster that GGG and Canelo would avoid. Jermall had a very close fight with Austin Trout and failed to hurt Trout or knock him down. This was a Trout who's best days were behind him. Canelo almost KOed a younger, better, undefeated version of Trout.and Lara beat Trout very easily before Jermall had such a hard fight with Trout. I think Jermall would lose to Jacobs, Canelo and GGG. He might beat the rest of the middleweights.
Just watched Heiland vs Charlo
Collapse
-
GGG fans like this are whats wrong with this site. The TS is a Manny fan that also like GGG. He is in no way trying to minimize or downplay a future win for GGG.Comment
-
cong**** on stopping a handicapped person lol. I once sparred with cramps in my right calf and it severely restricts you, because you cant put any weight on the leg and cant put leverage on your punches or use footwork to at least evade punches.I think part of the reason he didn't look accurate was because Heiland was awkward. However, if you looked at his footwork, he was on point. He was always in position to punch even when Heiland was all over the place. The fact that he hurt and stopped an opponent that was never stopped before wasn't bad.
I dont think Charlo looked bad. He probably wasnt sure what was up with heilands leg and played it safe the first rounds. Praising him for stopping heiland is little bit too much though.Comment
-
Was there testing for this fight? Maybe that's why he looked like that.Comment
-
-
Charlo went easy on him. Everybody knew he was hurt ffs.
Charlo's been fighting for 15+ years he knows exactly what it would like like if someone is hurt....a TV isn't the only truth.
Second, "Sometimes it can be decoy....". - Charlo
That right there clearly says he knew about it. It's better not to comment than to fumble with a theory like that
Comment
-
He said "pathetic and racist" doe...
Helland spend a good 1.5 years receiving step aside fees from Heiland under the WBC. Heiland was elevated to interim. The. Charlo came along and it was an eliminator...
So in short Heiland legacy was to never say anything about taking them step asides and to take another check against Charlo...
Comment
-
Charlo vs Canelo or Golovkin would be pretty dope thoughHe said "pathetic and racist" doe...
Helland spend a good 1.5 years receiving step aside fees from Heiland under the WBC. Heiland was elevated to interim. The. Charlo came along and it was an eliminator...
So in short Heiland legacy was to never say anything about taking them step asides and to take another check against Charlo...
Comment
-
I'm a big fan of Golovkin and I have to say that Charlo's performance was disapointing. Maybe he was confused because of Heiland's strange behavior. I don't see how being honest about a potential opponent's performance takes anything away from Golovkin.Comment
Comment