Under Roach would Rourke been more effectve than Pacman against Horn

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • juggernaut666
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Mar 2015
    • 15544
    • 1,226
    • 500
    • 87,472

    #1

    Under Roach would Rourke been more effectve than Pacman against Horn

    If Mickey Rourke had stayed with Roach and not act what would happen in boxing in his younger years?


    5
    He becomes ATG
    40.00%
    2
    He becomes a dangerous top guy
    0.00%
    0
    No body knows the trouble ive been ,nobody knows my sorrows
    60.00%
    3
  • danceswithfire
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jun 2012
    • 3590
    • 276
    • 394
    • 24,641

    #2
    .....

    he chose the right career

    Comment

    • boliodogs
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 33358
      • 824
      • 1,782
      • 309,589

      #3
      Rourke had zero potential to be a champion boxer even if he was trained by the best boxing trainers from early childhood. I saw one of his boxing wins over a hand picked bum. He boxed better than most movie actors and that's about it. He is a want to be boxer and that's all.

      Comment

      • Teetotaler
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • May 2014
        • 8434
        • 274
        • 404
        • 18,146

        #4
        Lol that third option doe

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP