The WBA requirement is VADA testing just like the WBC.
... I know... and look, man: I don't have any problems with them taking or not VADA testing... but, on their Twitter page, that post from Jul 27 (as cited above) is just missing as we speak... nothing more than this...
if you hold 3 belts, and you are likely the best fighter at middleweight..... FACT: you are NOT undisputed
even if you hold 3 belts, and are a HUGE favorite over the remaining belt-holder..... FACT: you are NOT undisputed
1) shht happens
2) styles make fights
3) you have to prove it in the ring, not on paper
Horn was a huge underdog, and so was the Japanese fighter who just beat Shiming
also, lineage..... is over-rated wankery..... and simply cannot be referred to as a "title"..... just like " The Ring "
" The Ring " recognition..... is simply the opinion of a magazine
" lineage " is just, the-man-who-beat-the-man...... and is weak justification used to elevate one fighter should the 4 major belts be fragmented..... the lineal "champ" is often not the best in his diivsion..... like Canelo, and Stevenson
since Hopkins, the lineal middleweight "champ" has never been the best in his division..... and is not the best in his division now
some could/will successfully argue Martinez, for a short time..... I would agree with that..... but he had Williams problems, Pavlik problems, and he was in no hurry to fight his biggest threat Golovkin due to timing
... I know... and look, man: I don't have any problems with them taking or not VADA testing... but, on their Twitter page, that post from Jul 27 (as cited above) is just missing as we speak... nothing more than this...
I wish it was for all the belts but it's cool it may not be necessary anyway. And if ggg does lose it will make the 160 pound division a little more interesting.
I guarantee the Golovtards saying Canelo isn't lineal will all be trying to claim Golovkin is lineal if he beats Canelo. Bunch of ******ed, flip flopping, knob jockeys.
he will be lineal if he beats Canelo
but it means nothing now, so will mean nothing then
Canelo would be a very good win, nothing more
they need Saunders, to get their paperwork in order
you would have to back Golovkin over Saunders should Gennady get past Canelo..... but that will not make Saunders disappear, Golovkin still has to beat him to be undisputed
Money is all that matters cash is King of the Ring not belts
Fighters fight for money and lots of it. screw title belts and fake organizations it's the money ******. Canelo wins the fight and GGG whines and cries like Kovalev did. Communists are like that cheap fraud bullies with no backbones.
... children, just made a print screen of VADA Twitter page...
... now show me where/when on Jul 27 that post is:
grandpa is really doubling down on this? Just take the word of everyone here (who knows how to use twitter) the tweet is real. This is embarrassing bro, it's not fake you can click on it and get sent to the actual tweet that takes you to the official VADA twitter page. LMAO
EDIT: the idiot keep looking for it on July 27 when the tweet clearly says June 27 2017. Scroll down dumb azzz.
if you hold 3 belts, and you are likely the best fighter at middleweight..... FACT: you are NOT undisputed
even if you hold 3 belts, and are a HUGE favorite over the remaining belt-holder..... FACT: you are NOT undisputed
1) shht happens
2) styles make fights
3) you have to prove it in the ring, not on paper
Horn was a huge underdog, and so was the Japanese fighter who just beat Shiming
also, lineage..... is over-rated wankery..... and simply cannot be referred to as a "title"..... just like " The Ring "
" The Ring " recognition..... is simply the opinion of a magazine
" lineage " is just, the-man-who-beat-the-man...... and is weak justification used to elevate one fighter should the 4 major belts be fragmented..... the lineal "champ" is often not the best in his diivsion..... like Canelo, and Stevenson
since Hopkins, the lineal middleweight "champ" has never been the best in his division..... and is not the best in his division now
some could/will successfully argue Martinez, for a short time..... I would agree with that..... but he had Williams problems, Pavlik problems, and he was in no hurry to fight his biggest threat Golovkin due to timing
Yep thats why they fight the fights. And yeah i wouldnt trust any publication thats owned by a promotional company. I was never to high on martinez, i actually made a good chunk of cash on cotto that night. While lineal may not be perfect in some instances, lile adonis stevenson. I believe it usually works itself out well. And i do believe ggg is best mw but not undisputed. Although after couple fights charlo will have his say in that. So lineal is flawed, but in this shady, flawed business it may be the best borometer of whats actually real. In most cases.
Comment