Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Canelo: My Style of Fighting is Superior To Golovkin's Style

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by Shadoww702 View Post
    Who are you talking about??? It can't be Canelo because he has one of the BEST jabs out there. Him and GGG both have superb jabs. His combo's are a thing of beauty... His body to uppercut his GORGEOUS. And almost ALL his combos involve the body.

    Sure he suks at cutting off the ring. He has very GOOD 1-2 foot movement but I admit his 4-5,6 SUKS!

    Which will be USELESS against GGG.

    But at least you let EVERYONE know you don't know SHT about boxing. So PROPS!
    Canelo looks good against guys that are smaller and past their prime. He doesn't against guys his own size that were not compromised.

    He even wouldn't fight GGG until he turned 35 and people think they are seeing him slip some.

    If Canelo was so good, his chosen opponents for last two years wouldn't have been Khan, Smith, and Zombie Chavez. Only one of them makes it two rounds with a prime Golovkin.

    Originally posted by Robi13 View Post
    Canelo hasn't said anything that isn't true or we already don't know so.... who care about the lames on here and their feelings
    Difference is, Canelo had pick of the litter, and aimed for Khan, a glass jawed LW. GGG aimed for a big MW whose now SMW, but settled for an undefeated WW who had fought as high as 155.

    Comparing Khan to Brook is funny.

    Comment


    • #72
      You must be mistaken , I never said anything about Kovaleb.
      As far as a casual fan goes , I have been watching boxing longer than you have been alive.
      Trust me when I say Canelo is in trouble and the fight hasn't even started.

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
        Canelo looks good against guys that are smaller and past their prime. He doesn't against guys his own size that were not compromised.

        He even wouldn't fight GGG until he turned 35 and people think they are seeing him slip some.

        If Canelo was so good, his chosen opponents for last two years wouldn't have been Khan, Smith, and Zombie Chavez. Only one of them makes it two rounds with a prime Golovkin.



        Difference is, Canelo had pick of the litter, and aimed for Khan, a glass jawed LW. GGG aimed for a big MW whose now SMW, but settled for an undefeated WW who had fought as high as 155.

        Comparing Khan to Brook is funny.
        Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
        Goes on to agree with me on one of my main points then goes on to say I don't **** about boxing. FACEPALM.

        Your just a proven casual tard who knows absolutely ZERO about boxing. You remind me of the clown football fanbois who use the term 1st touch at every chance & act as if u have a ****ing clue,(u don't)you use terms like "canelo sucks at cutting off the ring & has no footwork, ggg has amazing footwork because he is a master at it",that single statement instantly PROVES to anyone who's ever signed up for youth boxing at teen center etc that your a ABSOLUTE 100% NOVICE that has never boxed in your entire life.

        Normaly that would be ok if u learned from others that have,but your of the ****** 1legged gimp ilk that refused to learn anything long ago. The exact way u started goes like this,u heard about ggg at some point & decided that u will become his gggroupie since hes "white" like u, then u started listening to other gggroupies & regurgitating the nonsense their spewing & even started forming know nothing boxing theories as ive disproven with plain VERIFIABLE FACTS such as:ggg has amazing footwork (wrong his footwork is terrible,as soon as jacobs (his 1st test) started unloading combos on him,or trying to trade,ggg just froze & shelled up to withstand bombardment,same when brook lifted him off his feet with weak ass uppercut,gggs footwork is shît,his defense is beyond shît,if monroe or brook had canelos power gegee would be sleeped,he has cherrypicked straight zombies with no pulse until he was forced to fight a top actual mw who himself was b-level.

        Pro level boxers who aren't"runners"don't need to waste energy hopping around like mayweathers skinny ass,thats why spence/tank/canelo don't do that,they tiptoe in & out which allows them to plant their feet to generate force,as does ggg but he tries to almost tackle u, if Canelo tried to start fighting like lara hed become a runner,you cant be a ko artist/power puncher & a "runner" & still maintain,theres millions of variables but the bottom line is this,what morons call great footwork does not equal reality. Canelo/tank/spence all have great footwork,as they can all make u miss while remaining so called flat footed,it matters lil if u make someone miss by "running" or by just using lateral movement & step 1 foot in & out the pocket. Great footwork simply means using your feet to help you win the fight based on your specific style & makeup. But thats the thing ggg has shît footwork,hes been allowed to get by BECAUSE his opponents were cherrypicked. The main thing good footwork entails is DEFENSE if your only good going forward & shît going back like ggg then your footwork is shît.
        Last edited by kushking; 07-19-2017, 10:53 PM.

        Comment


        • #74
          if we excluded punching power, i'd have to agree

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
            Canelo looks good against guys that are smaller and past their prime. He doesn't against guys his own size that were not compromised.

            He even wouldn't fight GGG until he turned 35 and people think they are seeing him slip some.

            If Canelo was so good, his chosen opponents for last two years wouldn't have been Khan, Smith, and Zombie Chavez. Only one of them makes it two rounds with a prime Golovkin.



            Difference is, Canelo had pick of the litter, and aimed for Khan, a glass jawed LW. GGG aimed for a big MW whose now SMW, but settled for an undefeated WW who had fought as high as 155.

            Comparing Khan to Brook is funny.

            Really smaller & past their prime? Ggg fought rosado w 5 losses,made him jump to 160,kod him in 7 rds, Angulo kod him in 1 rd. Rubio( who was the win that led to gigi getting wbc 2 break rules & give him vacant jr belt.) had been destroyed by Chavez jr when he wasn't completely washed up like when ggg fought him yrs later. Lemieux (who ggg got vacant paper WBA from)had been whooped twice in a row BEFORE ggg fought him,by rubio,& alcine a garbage fighter w 8 losses.

            Alcine was destroyed in 2 rds by Angulo. Cotto who ggg took step aside money from like a hypocrit bîtch,was the LINEAL champ,he destroyed Geale in 4 rds to gggs 3. He also beat Martinez who was the true LINEAL champ unlike the paper champs gigi faced. That list of guys canelo beat & the common opponents w ggg PROVES you gggroupies are RE-TARDED 4 mentioning resume,& saying this bs u said above "ggg has fought better opponents","ggg would've did such & such" etc. Gggtards can only ever claim "wouldve, could've,if he had fought,etc.etc. BECAUSE hes a ***** who fought brook instead of Lara or even trout/andrade/charlo who wanted it at 160.

            Let this be a lesson to u never to talk this nonsense or ill just repost this.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by kushking View Post
              Your just a proven casual tard who knows absolutely ZERO about boxing. You remind me of the clown football fanbois who use the term 1st touch at every chance & act as if u have a ****ing clue,(u don't)you use terms like "canelo sucks at cutting off the ring & has no footwork, ggg has amazing footwork because he is a master at it",that single statement instantly PROVES to anyone who's ever signed up for youth boxing at teen center etc that your a ABSOLUTE 100% NOVICE that has never boxed in your entire life.

              Normaly that would be ok if u learned from others that have,but your of the ****** 1legged gimp ilk that refused to learn anything long ago. The exact way u started goes like this,u heard about ggg at some point & decided that u will become his gggroupie since hes "white" like u, then u started listening to other gggroupies & regurgitating the nonsense their spewing & even started forming know nothing boxing theories as ive disproven with plain VERIFIABLE FACTS such as:ggg has amazing footwork (wrong his footwork is terrible,as soon as jacobs (his 1st test) started unloading combos on him,or trying to trade,ggg just froze & shelled up to withstand bombardment,same when brook lifted him off his feet with weak ass uppercut,gggs footwork is shît,his defense is beyond shît,if monroe or brook had canelos power gegee would be sleeped,he has cherrypicked straight zombies with no pulse until he was forced to fight a top actual mw who himself was b-level.

              Pro level boxers who aren't"runners"don't need to waste energy hopping around like mayweathers skinny ass,thats why spence/tank/canelo don't do that,they tiptoe in & out which allows them to plant their feet to generate force,as does ggg but he tries to almost tackle u, if Canelo tried to start fighting like lara hed become a runner,you cant be a ko artist/power puncher & a "runner" & still maintain,theres millions of variables but the bottom line is this,what morons call great footwork does not equal reality. Canelo/tank/spence all have great footwork,as they can all make u miss while remaining so called flat footed,it matters lil if u make someone miss by "running" or by just using lateral movement & step 1 foot in & out the pocket. Great footwork simply means using your feet to help you win the fight based on your specific style & makeup. But thats the thing ggg has shît footwork,hes been allowed to get by BECAUSE his opponents were cherrypicked. The main thing good footwork entails is DEFENSE if your only good going forward & shît going back like ggg then your footwork is shît.
              EPIC MELTDOWN. Writing a page of gibberish to prove to me that ggg has bad footwork. Even his biggest critics point to ggg's footwork as the best in boxing. He's never out of position. Oh man. NSB has the dumbest boxing fans of any forum out there.

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by Biolink View Post
                Only a half hour of running seems kind of light, especially if he's eating and then taking a nap right after that.
                There is a lot more to training besides running. You've forgotten about all the sparring and many other exercises. Some fighters like Deontay Wilder don't even run and stamina is not an issue for him.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by satiev1 View Post
                  EPIC MELTDOWN. Writing a page of gibberish to prove to me that ggg has bad footwork. Even his biggest critics point to ggg's footwork as the best in boxing. He's never out of position. Oh man. NSB has the dumbest boxing fans of any forum out there.
                  Your a ******,I can give a shît what his detractors claim,some of them are know nothing,or in some cases they just concede a single point to u BECAUSE they want to find common ground. Not everyone claims they know everything,if they've never boxed,but ass fàgggs like u do claim to know it all & don't know jack shît,if ANYONE disagrees with my points they'll at least rebutt it but u won't because your a pathetic gggimp.

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Progrssive_Jedi View Post
                    Canelo looks good against guys that are smaller and past their prime. He doesn't against guys his own size that were not compromised.

                    He even wouldn't fight GGG until he turned 35 and people think they are seeing him slip some.

                    If Canelo was so good, his chosen opponents for last two years wouldn't have been Khan, Smith, and Zombie Chavez. Only one of them makes it two rounds with a prime Golovkin.



                    Difference is, Canelo had pick of the litter, and aimed for Khan, a glass jawed LW. GGG aimed for a big MW whose now SMW, but settled for an undefeated WW who had fought as high as 155.

                    Comparing Khan to Brook is funny.
                    And GGG has looked good against SHT Tomato cans so what's your point??? The 1st REAL opponent he fights and a LOT of ppl felt Jacobs WON!!! Almost ALL of the London brokes thought Jacobs WON!

                    Are you a FULL RTARD??? Or do you just play one??? House Arrest Wade??? ***!!! I REALLY NEED to post GGG's DOG SHT resume???

                    The fkn COWARD said 154-168 but ONLY at 160.

                    Even a POS like you should know Ward would of STOMPED lil G. Ward is Jacobs times 10000%

                    You DUMB ***! Even HIS PPL knew IT! GGG would have a LOSS if he fought Ward.
                    Last edited by Shadoww702; 07-19-2017, 11:06 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by kushking View Post
                      Really smaller & past their prime? Ggg fought rosado w 5 losses,made him jump to 160,kod him in 7 rds, Angulo kod him in 1 rd. Rubio( who was the win that led to gigi getting wbc 2 break rules & give him vacant jr belt.) had been destroyed by Chavez jr when he wasn't completely washed up like when ggg fought him yrs later. Lemieux (who ggg got vacant paper WBA from)had been whooped twice in a row BEFORE ggg fought him,by rubio,& alcine a garbage fighter w 8 losses.

                      Alcine was destroyed in 2 rds by Angulo. Cotto who ggg took step aside money from like a hypocrit bîtch,was the LINEAL champ,he destroyed Geale in 4 rds to gggs 3. He also beat Martinez who was the true LINEAL champ unlike the paper champs gigi faced. That list of guys canelo beat & the common opponents w ggg PROVES you gggroupies are RE-TARDED 4 mentioning resume,& saying this bs u said above "ggg has fought better opponents","ggg would've did such & such" etc. Gggtards can only ever claim "wouldve, could've,if he had fought,etc.etc. BECAUSE hes a ***** who fought brook instead of Lara or even trout/andrade/charlo who wanted it at 160.

                      Let this be a lesson to u never to talk this nonsense or ill just repost this.
                      I have CASH on Canelo. You notice how he NEVER backs up his sht talk with more than words??? I asked him MANY times to post his betting slip with GGG on it.... And he never does. He's ALL TALK! He want's GGG to win but doesn't REALLY believe it. Or he would make $$$$$ on it.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP