Will Lomachenko duck Berchelt?
Collapse
-
How hard is it for some of you to understand Walters HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO FIGHT IN MAY AND TURNED IT DOWN! He fought in November...and anyone who thinks at anytime Walters had any chance is just hating on lomachenko. Have some respect...walters is still a professional fighter, and he hardly laid a glove on lomachenko...i swear, black or white, some of you all are such hypocrites on this site.It seems like Lomachenko hates fighting fighters that are either active (Walters 1 year layoff), not Worn out (Martinez back to back wars with Salido the guy who beat Lomachenko) or not bums (Jason Sosa, Marriaga who is coming off a loss).
Ever since Lomachenko got exposed by Salido like Kovalev did by Ward as fighters who don't have any inside game and can't take shots to the body well he has been fighting fighters that he knows won't pressure him in ways were he will break down like Salido. Loma wants to fight pure boxers instead of rough rugged Mexican fighters who he knows will break his ass down. I won't even say Rigo because we know that is Loma's Voldemort.
Fighters Loma could fight that he would actually have a chance of losing to:
Oscar Valdez
Miguel Berchelt
Francisco Vargas (when he fully recovers)
Instead Lomachenko will continue to pad his record by fighting either bums or fighters that have had issues in their career leading up to the fight.
Lomachenko could fight Crawford for the #1 spot but we know he wont. Joshua took a risk fighting a newly motivated Wlad in a fight where he fought for his life, Francisco Vargas fought Berchelt coming off a war he didn't fully recover from. When will the excuses for Lomachenko stop?Comment
-
If Loma doesn't fight Berchelt, it won't be out of fear. It'll be because there's a better, clearer path to big paydays. TR has him on the fast track to stardom so he won't be able to make every stop we may want.
Personally, I think it's pretty clear that he'd destroy everyone at/below 130 with a couple of exceptions in Rigo and Valdez, which are up for debate.Comment
Comment