Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Horn Investigation: WBO Backs Scores, Explains Why

[PunchyPotorff]

I'm not saying it did or it didn't. I have no knowledge of anything like that and I would never make a public accusation of something I had no knowledge of.

I'm just saying there are other ways of doing things that don't require anything being paid under the table.

The fight wasn't in the US, so you don't have to worry about WBO judges being blocked and there's no reason to payoff the judges as the WBO could just assign whoever they know will do what they need.

So all there would be to pay off is the WBO, but why would you need to? Manny had an 8 figure purse. Fighters at that level rarely pay the standard sanctioning fee. The promoter negotiates with the sanctioning body. Why would you have to pay anything under the table when you're already negotiating how much is to be paid over the table?

You fail to take into consideration Arum's track record with the WBO, and his shady past in general in the sport. If it quacks like a duck....

[original zero]

You fail to take into consideration Arum's track record with the WBO, and his shady past in general in the sport. If it quacks like a duck....

hahaha no, i am not failing to take that into consideration. i'm taking that into full consideration. i'm just saying BRIBES are not necessarily required to gain major influence with a sanctioning body.

don king ruled the WBC with an iron fist for years and the WBC, unlike the others, always refused to take bribes. there are other ways to gain control.

[aboutfkntime]

hahahaha, not my fault if you have no idea how things work. haymon triple stacked 154 laying in wait until it was time to attack 160. no point when GGG was at his peak. but now haymon is going to throw mandatory after mandatory at GGG or canelo and we all know canelo will vacate rather than face charlo. guaranteed. and i don't blame him. wouldn't make any business sense to risk himself against a strong haymon mandatory.

why not just admit you have no idea how this business operates and save yourself the embarrassment?

it was your fault that this fanboy dribble appeared in your post

..... of course canelo will dump his belt to avoid charlo.....

the only people who make similar " observations "..... are butthurt whiney casual fans..... so considering the fact that you admittedly know nothing about boxing, I guess that makes sense

what sort of ****stain would say something so obviously childish


honestly, I have seen some mindless pieces-of-**** on these forums, but you really take the cake

admits that he knows nothing about boxing..... but proudly makes silly childish proclamations anyway

grow up kid, your panties are showing

[original zero]

it was your fault that this fanboy dribble appeared in your post

so why dont we bet on whether canelo vacates a belt when a charlo is the mandatory?

[aboutfkntime]

so why dont we bet on whether canelo vacates a belt when a charlo is the mandatory?

so, Canelo is ducking BOTH Charlo's now.... ?

bet on LMAO

you wouldn't know a good fighter if he punched you in the face

so, you must be quite confident that Canelo will beat GGG then
..... right ?

[original zero]

so, Canelo is ducking BOTH Charlo's now.... ?

bet on LMAO

you wouldn't know a good fighter if he punched you in the face

so, you must be quite confident that Canelo will beat GGG then
..... right ?

notice he pretends to laugh.... but he doesn't accept the bet. about time is always all talk. won't stand behind a single thing he says.

[aboutfkntime]

notice he pretends to laugh.... but he doesn't accept the bet. about time is always all talk. won't stand behind a single thing he says.

you are as observant as you are knowledgeable

read again, kid

what does " bet on " mean where you come from, maybe english is not your first language?

seriously, what a dumb fkn bet..... you are too ******

1) your bet relies upon Canelo beating Golovkin

2) your bet then relies upon Canelo staying unbeaten

3) your bet relies upon Charlo becoming ranked/mando

4) your bet relies upon Canelo then dumping his belt

5) all of that likely could/would take YEARS to eventuate

seriously, what a dumbass..... taking such a low % bet with all of those intangibles

* if Canelo fights Charlo, I win
* if Canelo doesn't fight Charlo, I win
* only under a particular set of unlikely circumstances can you win

I can see why you stated that boxing is not your forte'

notice he pretends that he didn't see this question..... all talk

so, you must be quite confident that Canelo will beat GGG then
..... right ?

[aboutfkntime]

I will accept your silly little bet, under the following conditions.....

a sig-bet, for 12 months

the rules are.....

* anything non-bannable goes

* the loser may add nothing else to their sig, other than the winner's sig-of-choice..... that space no longer belongs to them

..... you in ?

or are you chicken..... like golov-chicken..... ?

[original zero]

I will accept your silly little bet, under the following conditions.....

a sig-bet, for 12 months

oh no no no no you coward. i want you to put your money where your mouth is. $50,000. or if you're a broke loser, i will consider $5,000 if you show proof that you can't afford 50k.

[aboutfkntime]

oh no no no no you coward. i want you to put your money where your mouth is. $50,000. or if you're a broke loser, i will consider $5,000 if you show proof that you can't afford 50k.

fk off

like I would bet with some stranger on the internet

an ass-hat stranger to boot

and you have not earned an account bet, so forget that

your account is new, most likely an alt, and worth nothing

you have already embarrassed that account, I don't want it

I on the other hand, am a prized scalp

take it, or leave it

btw, I did explain in detail why that is a ******ed bet, didn't I ?

that's right, I did explain to you why your bet is ******ed..... which is why you STILL have not answered my question

so, you must be quite confident that Canelo will beat GGG then
..... right ?