Comments Thread For: Pacquiao-Horn Investigation: WBO Backs Scores, Explains Why

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shape up
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2016
    • 3123
    • 64
    • 0
    • 35,399

    #141
    Originally posted by ironmt
    Compubox Is only correct In certain circumstances. Mark my words, compubox will be used In the future to justify certain fighters wins, just as It has In the past.
    Funny thing that, most of the posters saying how bad the compubox stats are in this instance were quoting them as gospel when Floyd fought pacquaio, it amazes me how they can lie to themselves so easily yet expect their opinion to hold credit, astounding

    Comment

    • kennethjohn
      Interim Champion
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Jan 2010
      • 577
      • 20
      • 1
      • 6,799

      #142
      Originally posted by Mammoth
      I thought boxingscene scored it correctly
      Harold letterman would have scored it wide for horn due to "effective agression"

      Comment

      • Shape up
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2016
        • 3123
        • 64
        • 0
        • 35,399

        #143
        Originally posted by original zero
        it's usually a little more nuanced than that. judges get the appointment from the sanctioning body knowing what's expected of them. don't need to necessarily pay anybody off. arum is the WBO's biggest customer. it's a symbiotic relationship. there's really no need for literal bribery or anything like that.
        I don't remember the NSAC being a sanctioning body

        Comment

        • ironmt
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Sep 2006
          • 3409
          • 153
          • 81
          • 10,887

          #144
          Originally posted by Shape up
          Funny thing that, most of the posters saying how bad the compubox stats are in this instance were quoting them as gospel when Floyd fought pacquaio, it amazes me how they can lie to themselves so easily yet expect their opinion to hold credit, astounding
          Yes, absolutely. In that circumstance, compubox was 100% accurate because the numbers favored Floyd. When the numbers favored Pacquiao than suddenly compubox Is $h!t and extremely Inaccurate and who ever relies on compubox don't know $h!t about boxing.

          Floyd Mayweather was a great fighter at one time, his fans have always been $h!t.

          Comment

          • ironmt
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 3409
            • 153
            • 81
            • 10,887

            #145
            Originally posted by aboutfkntime
            compubox can never be used to justify a win, EVER

            how could anyone possibly think that

            compubox is just one of the standard excuses that casuals roll out


            #refdoe
            #judgesdoe
            #shoulderdoe
            #compuboxdoe
            You might want to relay that to the Floyd fans on this board who used compubox numbers to justify Mayweathers win over Pacquiao. There were many.

            Comment

            • Strategic1
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Dec 2013
              • 2569
              • 62
              • 0
              • 11,951

              #146
              So Eric Morales, Jmm, and Bradley .. all scored it for Pacquiao.

              I assume Morales and JMM were analyzing the fight ringside. Correct me if I'm wrong.

              This is just pathetic how the WBO is allowed to do this. IMO they forced the judges to score it consistent with how the 2 judges scored 115-113 at the fight.

              Comment

              • HennyBogan
                Amateur
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Jul 2017
                • 12
                • 0
                • 0
                • 6,047

                #147
                Doesn't it depend on who is punching the buttons on compubox? So far we've got 8 qualified judges giving it to Horn which surely outweighs 2 jockeys on compubox.

                Comment

                • Mammoth
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Sep 2016
                  • 35676
                  • 3,828
                  • 3,378
                  • 378,304

                  #148
                  Originally posted by kennethjohn
                  Harold letterman would have scored it wide for horn due to "effective agression"
                  He would have scored it wide just for Horn coming forward

                  Comment

                  • Daniel_T5
                    Interim Champion
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 740
                    • 17
                    • 11
                    • 11,065

                    #149
                    Originally posted by kennethjohn
                    Harold letterman would have scored it wide for horn due to "effective agression"
                    hahah so true

                    Comment

                    • BrometheusBob.
                      All Time Great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 20457
                      • 915
                      • 1,915
                      • 156,555

                      #150
                      The WBO can blow me

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP