Reading Between the Lines: Shane Mosley vs. Father Time

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ProBox1
    The GodFather
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Sep 2004
    • 5070
    • 246
    • 6
    • 13,925

    #1

    Reading Between the Lines: Shane Mosley vs. Father Time

    So much to do and so little time in which to do it; that is the case for us all, but those words ring truer for professional athletes than for those in any other profession. Ali was done by age 36, losing to the unheralded Leon Spinks. Larry Holmes was 35 when he lost to “Neon” Leon’s younger brother, Light Heavyweight Legend Michael Spinks; and though his career continued through his fifties and he picked up a win of some significance here and there, “The Easton Assassin” never pulled the trigger quite as quickly as he once did against Ken Norton, Mike Weaver, and Gerry Cooney. “Sugar” Ray Leonard looked like an old man at 34 against Terry Norris; Jack Dempsey called it a career at 32 after his second loss to Tunney. The list goes on and on; and sadly enough, some never get the message. [details]
  • jason100x
    SLAY HER
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Feb 2006
    • 1102
    • 65
    • 120
    • 7,848

    #2
    I think it's interesting how different people have "Father Time" catch up with them at different ages. You have, as you say, Ali who lost the title to Leon Spinks and looked old at 36. You have Archie Moore who fought at the champion level well into his forties, and Erik Morales who looks as if he might be nearing the end in his early thirties, or Tyson for that matter who lost most of his effectiveness by his mid to late twenties.
    There are many factors that affect when someone starts looking older and less effective such as distractions outside the ring, lack of motivation in training, and injuries taking their toll on the individual. But many times it is merely the body clock catching up with the person. I'd be curious if anyone knows what the average age is that things start diminishing.

    Comment

    • Manager
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • May 2006
      • 125
      • 6
      • 0
      • 6,460

      #3
      I think it depends on a fighter’s style. Boxers who have perfected their jab and defense like Bernard Hopkins will last a lot longer than say a Roy Jones Jr. who spent his entire career doing nothing but using his speed and countering abilities to win fights.

      Comment

      • jason100x
        SLAY HER
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2006
        • 1102
        • 65
        • 120
        • 7,848

        #4
        The brawler types definitely wear out faster than a defensive/cautious minded boxer. That's true about a boxer's style affecting their longevity in the game, but I suppose that simple genetics plays a factor also. That's just a guess, though.

        Comment

        • K-DOGG
          Mitakuye Oyasin
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 5851
          • 406
          • 396
          • 25,885

          #5
          Originally posted by Manager
          I think it depends on a fighter’s style. Boxers who have perfected their jab and defense like Bernard Hopkins will last a lot longer than say a Roy Jones Jr. who spent his entire career doing nothing but using his speed and countering abilities to win fights.
          Style and Lifestyle....and genetics in some cases.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP