I think people are mad it wasn't a more known fighter to take pacman down..

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jmrf4435
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Jun 2014
    • 8397
    • 772
    • 14
    • 66,112

    #1

    I think people are mad it wasn't a more known fighter to take pacman down..

    I get the sense by media and fans.."why couldn't it be crawford or lomachenko?" They say...

    Pac-bradley 1 was worse, so was kov-ward 1. It's not the worst thing we've seen just this year in boxing

    IS this an overreaction guys??????
  • ironmt
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Sep 2006
    • 3409
    • 153
    • 81
    • 10,887

    #2
    Originally posted by jmrf4435
    I get the sense by media and fans.."why couldn't it be crawford or lomachenko?" They say...

    Pac-bradley 1 was worse, so was kov-ward 1. It's not the worst thing we've seen just this year in boxing

    IS this an overreaction guys??????
    I agree that Pac-Bradley was worse. At the end of the day Pacquiao deserved the decision and didn't get It, although he didn't look good doing It.

    Comment

    • Beercules
      Lounge POTY '17
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Aug 2013
      • 65183
      • 4,940
      • 7,203
      • 950,179

      #3
      I am going to JFK Jeff.

      Comment

      • Mammoth
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Sep 2016
        • 35676
        • 3,828
        • 3,378
        • 378,304

        #4
        Kov-Ward was closer, dummy

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP