Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Manny Pacquiao vs. Jeff Horn - CompuBox Punch Stats

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by BIGPOPPAPUMP View Post
    Manny Pacquiao had a 182-92 edge in total punches landed, hitting on 32%. Pacquiao had a 123-73 edge in power landed, bolstered by a huge ninth round. Jeff Horn threw more punches in nine of the twelve rounds, but landed just 15%
    [Click Here To Read More]


    I came here to watch people check compubox to see who won

    Comment


    • #12
      go check GGG Jacobs compubox. and tell if GGG deserved to win

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by dan_cov View Post
        Anyone willing to do a totally honest RBR punch count? It can't be a fan of either. Someone that will keep it 100.

        I'll give you this many e-points 774,500,050,563,567,190,016 (Whatever that is like 774 kapzillion, gazillion, scrillion or some ****)
        I don't have much, but I don't care about my e-points, the person who does it gets all my e-points.

        Comment


        • #14
          Anyone with even a shred of boxing knowledge knows that CompuBox is the most ludicrous, tendentious, backwater, medieval way of accumulating statistical evidence. To even mention it on your "reputable" boxing website is to besmirch it. How can a boxing website expect to anyone to take it seriously when it allows such filth to be discussed? Headlines like the above serve only to perpetuate a great and pernicious fallacy. This sport is crying out for objectivity, clarity, transparency-TRUTH!. It is immoral and reprehensible to use the word "CompuBox"

          Comment


          • #15
            **** CompuBox. I'm not even sure why boxing websites still even cite it. It is never accurate.

            Comment


            • #16
              that compubox was way off

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Palakin Stu View Post
                Anyone with even a shred of boxing knowledge knows that CompuBox is the most ludicrous, tendentious, backwater, medieval way of accumulating statistical evidence. To even mention it on your "reputable" boxing website is to besmirch it. How can a boxing website expect to anyone to take it seriously when it allows such filth to be discussed? Headlines like the above serve only to perpetuate a great and pernicious fallacy. This sport is crying out for objectivity, clarity, transparency-TRUTH!. It is immoral and reprehensible to use the word "CompuBox"
                Post of The Week, could not have said it better. You heard it, B.S., no more CompuBox "stats," please.

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by dan_cov View Post
                  I'd happily donate a large amount if someone could be assed.
                  I'm genuinely intrigued to see the results I mean in round 10 I could of sworn Manny barely threw anything that round after having Horn hurt, I recall thinking he may of punched himself out. Really shocked to see he apparently threw 44 punches that round & he certainly didn't outland Horn in 11 of 12 rounds and by over double in 7/12 rounds.

                  Maybe I was perhaps swayed, caught in the moment & Horns workrate deceived me somewhat but I am still finding these numbers ridiculously off.
                  12 of us should take a round each.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Just look at the Horn's face and on Pac's face. Period.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Yeah, Compubox is terrible. They should use the NSB fight night consensus tallies instead, much more reliable!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP