Comments Thread For: Jamie Cox, Erik Skoglund Join World Boxing Super Series

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BIGPOPPAPUMP
    Franchise Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2003
    • 46539
    • 2,259
    • 334
    • 5,493,285

    #1

    Comments Thread For: Jamie Cox, Erik Skoglund Join World Boxing Super Series

    The World Boxing Super Series is delighted to announce that two more undefeated fighters have signed up for the Muhammad Ali Trophy, The Greatest Prize in Boxing. Erik Skoglund (26-0, 12 KOs) and Jamie Cox (22-0, 12 KOs) have joined a star-studded tournament line-up that already features four reigning world champions and two former world champions. The duo will compete in the super-middleweight competition, with WBA Super Champion George Groves among the potential opponents.
    [Click Here To Read More]
  • OctoberRed
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Aug 2006
    • 14251
    • 797
    • 295
    • 135,200

    #2
    I was wondering when the other guys were joining on for the 168 portion.

    Comment

    • BOXINGADICT
      Banned
      • Jun 2017
      • 831
      • 31
      • 19
      • 1,129

      #3
      Originally posted by octoberred
      i was wondering when the other guys were joining on for the 168 portion.
      anthony dirrell and callum smith might join also according to hearn

      Comment

      • Chrismart
        OK Jim...
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Apr 2007
        • 14271
        • 827
        • 1,759
        • 308,493

        #4
        Kind of a shame Cox Vs Feilding is now off. But obviously, this is a bigger stage for Cox to be involved in.

        Comment

        • BattlingNelson
          Mod a Phukka
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 29877
          • 3,253
          • 3,197
          • 286,536

          #5
          I hope that Skoglund isn't to drained for this. Starting his career at cruiser followed by a move to LHW and now this.

          Comment

          • rudy
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Sep 2003
            • 5886
            • 660
            • 1,173
            • 52,192

            #6
            I hear Chris Eubanks Jnr is going in

            Comment

            • Eff Pandas
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Apr 2012
              • 52131
              • 3,624
              • 2,147
              • 1,635,919

              #7
              Originally posted by rudy
              I hear Chris Eubanks Jnr is going in
              Who's saying that?

              I have a hard time believing Eubank Sr would let him in this tournament where they likely won't have as much control as they are used to. Although looking at the participants thus far I think I'd favor Eubank Jr to win it if he was in.

              As to this news, oh well lol. The 168 tournament is gonna be much softer than the 200 tournament apparrently. The 200lb tournament gots 5 guys in & 5 guys ranked in the TBRB top ten & the 168lb tournament gots 3 guys in & 1 guy in the TBRB top ten & 1 guy I don't even feel has proven himself to be a world class guy yet (Cox).

              Comment

              • BattlingNelson
                Mod a Phukka
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Mar 2008
                • 29877
                • 3,253
                • 3,197
                • 286,536

                #8
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                Who's saying that?

                I have a hard time believing Eubank Sr would let him in this tournament where they likely won't have as much control as they are used to. Although looking at the participants thus far I think I'd favor Eubank Jr to win it if he was in.

                As to this news, oh well lol. The 168 tournament is gonna be much softer than the 200 tournament apparrently. The 200lb tournament gots 5 guys in & 5 guys ranked in the TBRB top ten & the 168lb tournament gots 3 guys in & 1 guy in the TBRB top ten & 1 guy I don't even feel has proven himself to be a world class guy yet (Cox).
                What has happened to Ramirez?

                Comment

                • mlac
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2014
                  • 20301
                  • 1,620
                  • 1,475
                  • 210,093

                  #9
                  Eubanks and Benevidez or we riot

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52131
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BattlingNelson
                    What has happened to Ramirez?
                    Whats he said about being in?

                    I'd be surprised if he's in due to TR & this new ESPN deal.

                    I think this whole concept isn't likely to be a thing some of these older school promoters or the bigger/stronger promoters, like Arum, will be into letting their fighters jump into. Those old school guys & bigger/stronger promoters like to keep the energy from a win & the title in house. This tournament goes against that. I mean it could be Ramirez, who whoever, goes to this tournament & comes back the winner & bigger then ever. Thing is its possible he comes back after some KO L + without his belt & Arum or whoever would have to build up their guy all over again & they have no association with the guy who beat him.

                    So I LOVE this WBSS concept, but the way boxing works & the way many of these promoters are used to it working goes against how this tournament works & I wouldn't be surprised with many promoters opting out their fighters from it because of that.

                    I'd love to be wrong about that doe.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP