Who is the better fighter Carl Froch or Sergey Kovalev?

[$tate of Mind]

Who is the better fighter in your opinion Carl Froch or Sergey Kovalev?

[.!WAR MIKEY!.]

Carl Froch easy! aint even a discussion.

Close thread.

End Thread.

[$tate of Mind]

Carl Froch easy! aint even a discussion.

Close thread.

End Thread.

Froch is a hell of a fighter no doubt. I miss him. He beat a better version of Pascal than Kovalev did.

[Blu]

Froch has more than one punch.

[Citizen Koba]

Who is the better fighter in your opinion Carl Froch or Sergey Kovalev?

Kovalev is the more skilled. I think Froch may be tougher both physically and mentally.

There's a reason why Ward said that Froch was a tougher fight, man. Carl might have been out of his depth skillwise but the dude never stopped coming and by the championship rounds Ward was starting to look increasingly uncomfortable. Contrast that to Kovalev I where Sergei never really seemed to trouble him much after about the sixth and basically allowed Dre to dictate the pace in the second half.

[kiDynamite92]

Kovalev is the more skilled. I think Froch may be tougher both physically and mentally.

There's a reason why Ward said that Froch was a tougher fight, man. Carl might have been out of his depth skillwise but the dude never stopped coming and by the championship rounds Ward was starting to look increasingly uncomfortable. Contrast that to Kovalev I where Sergei never really seemed to trouble him much after about the sixth and basically allowed Dre to dictate the pace in the second half.

you're insane.

[bowlingkid09]

It's Kovalev and it's not even that close either.

[Earl-Hickey]

This is an insult to Froch

Kovalevs resume is a literally 50 year old hopkins and that's it.

I also never saw froch quit in a fight against a featherfist either

[A-Wolf]

Froch. Silly question.

[bowlingkid09]

This is an insult to Froch

Kovalevs resume is a literally 50 year old hopkins and that's it.

I also never saw froch quit in a fight against a featherfist either

1. Your first point is incredibly inaccurate (Froch has a better cumulative body of work; don't get me wrong).

2. I never saw Kovalev get badly outclassed by that same featherfist you mentioned.