Originally posted by $Manny_P$
Pac Man vs Rocky: Who Wins?
Collapse
-
he has good defense against hookers. His face is always open for straight punches and jabs.Originally posted by mic573I'm sure he would but don't underestimate his defense either. He has better defense than Barrera, Morales and Velasquez.Comment
-
rocky will see that coming all night long and step to the side or take a step back, one thing rocky is also good at is being in range of when to throw or when to avoid a punch, i can easily see pacquiao throwing his bombs, commiting on each and everyone and rocky laying back setting up for bomb of a left hook or right hand, pacquiao lunging right into this punch and his legs give out and he's on the floorOriginally posted by $Manny_P$and when Pac lands 1 straight left on Juarez, he gets floored just like Barrera, Marquez, Velasquez, Morales etc......Comment
-
yea right? Pac would feed Rocky Juarez a Happy Meal of Pacwich all night.Originally posted by ferocityrocky will see that coming all night long and step to the side or take a step back, one thing rocky is also good at is being in range of when to throw or when to avoid a punch, i can easily see pacquiao throwing his bombs, commiting on each and everyone and rocky laying back setting up for bomb of a left hook or right hand, pacquiao lunging right into this punch and his legs give out and he's on the floor
Pac is too fast, too aggressive, too powerful, too relentless. The only chance Juarez has is to box, but even that he won't accomplish. He doesn't have a long jab like Morales, or a long straight punch that works well on southpaws. Juarez better not sign a fight with Pac or his carreer will be on the line early before he reaches his prime.Comment
-
i agree w/you.i guess this fight will be one-sided like what pacquiao did to barrera.pacman will kill rocky.Originally posted by $Manny_P$yea right? Pac would feed Rocky Juarez a Happy Meal of Pacwich all night.
Pac is too fast, too aggressive, too powerful, too relentless. The only chance Juarez has is to box, but even that he won't accomplish. He doesn't have a long jab like Morales, or a long straight punch that works well on southpaws. Juarez better not sign a fight with Pac or his carreer will be on the line early before he reaches his prime.Comment
-
what fight were you watchingOriginally posted by $Manny_P$yea right? Pac would feed Rocky Juarez a Happy Meal of Pacwich all night.
Pac is too fast, too aggressive, too powerful, too relentless. The only chance Juarez has is to box, but even that he won't accomplish. He doesn't have a long jab like Morales, or a long straight punch that works well on southpaws. Juarez better not sign a fight with Pac or his carreer will be on the line early before he reaches his prime.
Comment
-
1st you can say morales was using the jab, 2nd fight he hardly threw in combination but he did throw more right hands that stopped pacquiao cold in his tracksOriginally posted by $Manny_P$same fight as you, but I wasn't wearing "Bias Goggles" On.
Comment
-
I am neutra between u and Manny P, but what fight are u talking about?Originally posted by ferocity1st you can say morales was using the jab, 2nd fight he hardly threw in combination but he did throw more right hands that stopped pacquiao cold in his tracks
EM-MP 1, Morales won by UD but its not really a one sided beating. It was a candidate for the fight of the year because both figthers were giving it all.
EM-MP 2, EM dominated round 3-5, then Manny took over, u know the result.Comment
-
Originally posted by loui_ludwigI am neutra between u and Manny P, but what fight are u talking about?
EM-MP 1, Morales won by UD but its not really a one sided beating. It was a candidate for the fight of the year because both figthers were giving it all.
EM-MP 2, EM dominated round 3-5, then Manny took over, u know the result.
wrong thread, but even larry merchant aggrees with me that morales dominated pacquiao in their first fight 7-3 is domination of your opponetComment
Comment