Anthony Joshua's win was more impressive from a offensive standpoint (which is to inflict greater damage upon the opponent).
Tyson Fury's win was more impressive from a defensive standpoint (which is getting hit less by the opponent).
So overall, one MIGHT argue that it was EQUALLY impressive by both Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury. However, I can't accept any argument that Tyson Fury's performance was MORE impressive than Joshua's.
For Tyson Fury to have had a more impressive victory against Wlad, he had to get hit as less as he did in the fight, but also able to stop Wlad within the distance whilst inflicting as much damage or more damage upon Wlad than Anthony Joshua. However, that wasn't the case!
Again, Fury was better defensively whilst Joshua was better offensively. So it's one each!
Tyson Fury's win was more impressive from a defensive standpoint (which is getting hit less by the opponent).
So overall, one MIGHT argue that it was EQUALLY impressive by both Anthony Joshua and Tyson Fury. However, I can't accept any argument that Tyson Fury's performance was MORE impressive than Joshua's.
For Tyson Fury to have had a more impressive victory against Wlad, he had to get hit as less as he did in the fight, but also able to stop Wlad within the distance whilst inflicting as much damage or more damage upon Wlad than Anthony Joshua. However, that wasn't the case!
Again, Fury was better defensively whilst Joshua was better offensively. So it's one each!
Comment