Video slow motion proves shots were low

[ironmt]

No Larry, you are a pathetic loser. You called me an alt three times in my first hour on this forum. Go punch yourself in the bladder and balls (if you have any) a few times and do not bend over big man.

LOL, another hilarious post, thanks. I also like the belt line picture.

[big_james10]

The first shot in the video shows half of ward's gloves going below the belt. The 2nd shot in slow motion clearly shows ward's gloves fully below the belt. I've never witnessed someone get away with such cheating in my life since I started watching boxing. I do agree that ward had more momentum going into the 8th, but if you're a ward fan and you can't admit those were low blows you're a biased fan boy.

1:05 clearly below the belt.

Different vid shorter clip. Blatant low blow. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFzrIExfX3c

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUJ58VPjiMg

Video slow motion doesn't prove a damn thing. This sound like that lame ass argument that Pacquaio fans tried to use when they said if you watch the Mayweather fight in slow motion, Pacquaio won. You are grasping at straws and not doing a good job of it.

Also, as I have stated before, when a fighter chooses to bend over, any punch his opponent throws is a legal punch. It is not Andre Ward's fault that Kovalev bent over to duck those last three body shots. If Kovalev had stayed upright, there would be no question about the legality of the punches.

[Chuckguy]

It was practically an even fight before the 8th. Any fighter who get s hit with repeated low blows and the ref doses nothing will end up losing a 50/50 fight.That's a ******ed way of looking at it. So from now on, we shouldn't care if one guy hits the other guy low 5 times and dosen't get called for it?

No because the probability of them changing the call are slim to none and no way does this fight get a third