Comments Thread For: Ward: To Talk Low Blows, Must Mention Kovalev's Rabbit Punches

[BoxHec]

yes, it was

were either of these punches low..... ?



..... well, then why did Kovalev act like those punches were low and try to milk a foul?

you say that I won't admit it was a bad stoppage..... not true, Weeks should have allowed the fight to continue..... but what I am saying is, you guys won't admit that Kovalev was taking a dive, and that he was done

on a slightly different note, and just for fun..... what is worse, a couple of punches slipping low, or taking a dive?

You are absolute right, and on that gif at real speed it was not really big body punches

And yes the reef should let Ward finish Kova for good after a severe punishment and a serious beating ending by a brutal KO! but Kova quit before because he was clearly out and in big trouble, and (& but) the reef was probably tired of Kova's charades with his "fake low blows"

Kovaleva, Klima, and Kathy (The Triple K of Bad Losers) and their fans are champions to make excuses after excuses but the only "good excuse" they can have at that point is that Kovaleva wanted to got to the sh!*ter and was afraid to poop after each body punches!

Andre Ward: "Take it Bully!"


Kovaleva: "Dam I want to poop"


Kovaleva: "No! not now bro, I'm not clean!"


LOL!

[BoxHec]

Crazy! John David Jackson choke Kovalev's big brother!

[aboutfkntime]

You see the right uppercut you showed, that if you had ever wore a protector you'd know how that shot moves the cup it rides up into your nuts. Not the equivalent of the last low shot but it hurts and it's illegal. You guys are talking like it's Mike McCallum level body work. Yeah maybe Kovalev was looking for a point deduction, yeah maybe he was tired, but "good bodywork" don't look like that.

no way, not true..... BOTH of those punches were legit

Kovalev faked a foul, following two legit bodyshots

Golovkin/Jacobs was more controversial than this fight, simply because the result was in question..... the result is not in question regarding this fight, because Kovalev was done

[bluepete]

no way, not true..... BOTH of those punches were legit

Kovalev faked a foul, following two legit bodyshots

Golovkin/Jacobs was more controversial than this fight, simply because the result was in question..... the result is not in question regarding this fight, because Kovalev was done

Nope, look at that right uppercut. Half of he's hand lands in the dark area of Kovalev's trunks. As its got an upwards trajectory it lifts the protector and it rides up into your nuts. I've had the same thing happen to me. So just in that clip you can see a "borderline" shot, that wouldve hurt. Maybe he made a meal of it abit. But it wasn't a "legit" ****.Nor were some of the others. The last one was low without question. That's why we now have a new narrative emerging about Kovalevs trunks, even though if you look at the pics both fighters belts stop at the very bottom of the lats, which is standard. He was complaining, that's not the same as quitting. Like I say similar to BHop against Calzaghe, except the main one which was definitely low.People on here are trying to pass it off like Hatton Castillo or Jones against Hill. It was closer to a Golota at the end. Other than to someone who just hates Kovalev, and I can see why some feel like that, it wasn't a good ending or "classic body attack".

[bluepete]

no way, not true..... BOTH of those punches were legit

Kovalev faked a foul, following two legit bodyshots

Golovkin/Jacobs was more controversial than this fight, simply because the result was in question..... the result is not in question regarding this fight, because Kovalev was done

Again I can see why some people had it for Jacobs, but the robbery narrative again is because they can't see the nuances of defence when it's a come forward fighter. Golovkin does not take anywhere near the amount of good shots people make out. That's why he's never been dropped or marked up by guys like Jacobs who is a good hitter. Although he landed more "power punches" they are just shots that aren't jabs, not necessarily solid flush punches. Lots of the flashy stuff missed. He landed lots of jabs which are like power punches when GGG throws then, knocking the head back. It werent no robbery, have a look at some slow mo film studies.Strangely, for people who saw Ward doing well in the first Kovalev fight, largely on an effective jab and subtle defence, the same people don't see Golovkins power jab and subtle head movement coming forward. They see Wards stoppage as from legit body shots, but think Golovkins knock down of Jacobs was a push. They talk about respect, but all the gay slurs I see on here are reserved for GGG. Why, because he came forward the whole night against a younger bigger power puncher? Insane.

[aboutfkntime]

Nope, look at that right uppercut. Half of he's hand lands in the dark area of Kovalev's trunks. As its got an upwards trajectory it lifts the protector and it rides up into your nuts. I've had the same thing happen to me. So just in that clip you can see a "borderline" shot, that wouldve hurt. Maybe he made a meal of it abit. But it wasn't a "legit" ****.Nor were some of the others. The last one was low without question. That's why we now have a new narrative emerging about Kovalevs trunks, even though if you look at the pics both fighters belts stop at the very bottom of the lats, which is standard. He was complaining, that's not the same as quitting. Like I say similar to BHop against Calzaghe, except the main one which was definitely low.People on here are trying to pass it off like Hatton Castillo or Jones against Hill. It was closer to a Golota at the end. Other than to someone who just hates Kovalev, and I can see why some feel like that, it wasn't a good ending or "classic body attack".

they were 100% legit

they were on the belt

" borderline ", is legit

in REAL talk..... everything that doesn't get called, is legit

seriously, this is bottom-of-the-barrel whining

Golovkin/Jacobs was more controversial..... because the loser of that fight had an argument to be the winner..... he wasn't out on his feet, faking fouls

[bluepete]

they were 100% legit

they were on the belt

" borderline ", is legit

in REAL talk..... everything that doesn't get called, is legit

seriously, this is bottom-of-the-barrel whining

Golovkin/Jacobs was more controversial..... because the loser of that fight had an argument to be the winner..... he wasn't out on his feet, faking fouls

Ward got called in round two for identical punches to what are being called borderline. Refs don't always get it right, as the last punch showed. On the belt isn't when half of your fist is on the part of the shorts below the belt line. Golovkin /Jacobs wasn't any more controversial than Ward, Kovalev one, which has gradually turned into a Ward masterclass on here. In real talk Tony Weeks is a rubbish ref who is being called out on here for ignoring fouling in Floyd/Maidana and when Kovalev supposedly was rabbit punching in the Ward rematch. Now he's call is beyond reproach and omnipresent. I get it. I don't mind people saying they think Ward was on he's way to winning. But don't make out it ended on a legit body attack. Although Andre could've targeted the ribs solar plexus or liver, he threw a few that landed on the belt, more than one or two at least partially low, and a full on low one at the end. If Golovkin did Jacobs in a similar way in a rematch, we both know the pro USA narrative would be deafening. I can like a fighter and see fault. Mike Tyson was my favourite but he shouldve been chucked out against Norris. I don't think Golovkin beats Hagler.Im from the UK but can see Fury and Saunders are pricks and Wlad should've been ahead against Joshua. But team USA seem to have the Trump way of seeing things now. Reality is what they say it is.

[aboutfkntime]

Ward got called in round two for identical punches to what are being called borderline. Refs don't always get it right, as the last punch showed. On the belt isn't when half of your fist is on the part of the shorts below the belt line. Golovkin /Jacobs wasn't any more controversial than Ward, Kovalev one, which has gradually turned into a Ward masterclass on here. In real talk Tony Weeks is a rubbish ref who is being called out on here for ignoring fouling in Floyd/Maidana and when Kovalev supposedly was rabbit punching in the Ward rematch. Now he's call is beyond reproach and omnipresent. I get it. I don't mind people saying they think Ward was on he's way to winning. But don't make out it ended on a legit body attack. Although Andre could've targeted the ribs solar plexus or liver, he threw a few that landed on the belt, more than one or two at least partially low, and a full on low one at the end. If Golovkin did Jacobs in a similar way in a rematch, we both know the pro USA narrative would be deafening. I can like a fighter and see fault. Mike Tyson was my favourite but he shouldve been chucked out against Norris. I don't think Golovkin beats Hagler.Im from the UK but can see Fury and Saunders are pricks and Wlad should've been ahead against Joshua. But team USA seem to have the Trump way of seeing things now. Reality is what they say it is.

let's agree to disagree, and leave it there

but.....

FACT: both of those punches were legit
FACT: Kovalev was done

Ward can continue to " earn " his credibility for you guys who don't think that he is up to the job..... I certainly don't need to be here defending him

you either know, or you don't know

and, you don't seem to understand that " borderline " is legit

but I will take some money off you when it comes to Stevenson

peace

[Vegemil]

Lol I just love the context of this. No disrespect to Ward but he's basically saying, "Yo man Kovalev was cheatin so I had to punch him in the balls a couple times".

[bluepete]

let's agree to disagree, and leave it there

but.....

FACT: both of those punches were legit
FACT: Kovalev was done

Ward can continue to " earn " his credibility for you guys who don't think that he is up to the job..... I certainly don't need to be here defending him

you either know, or you don't know

and, you don't seem to understand that " borderline " is legit

but I will take some money off you when it comes to Stevenson

peace

Of course we can agree to disagree, I quite enjoy our debates. I just say it how I see it. I've got nothing against Ward though, I think he's the best guy at the weight. Although I admire he's skill hes style isn't my cup of tea,but for the most part he was more positive on Saturday and it was a better performance than the first fight. I think he beats Stevenson although Adonis has the power to put him or anyone away. I don't see him at heavyweight or even Cruiser against guys like Usyk. Jones had the athleticism, Toney had the chin and defence to stand in there. I'll give him Bellew though.