Originally posted by larryxxx.
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
why do people support exciting fighters?
Collapse
-
-
Way better watching guys on the backfoot pot shotting guys a la Rigo. So much excitement... The only reason Rigo is not a star is because of racism...
Who doesn't want to see 2 guys studying each other for 3 rounds than pot shot them self to a UD?? Thats racist yo
Comment
-
Your premise is probably inaccurate. Like any sport, people catch boxing for entertainment. Yes, some fans can appreciate the sweet science, and some may even prefer boxers who can exhibit elite skills in the ring, but there are other fans who like action-packed fights.
So I think fighters like Floyd, Lara, Rigo are exciting based on their skill sets. And Golovkin and Gatti are exciting for other reasons.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kuyukut View Postwhat is there to like. it makes no sense. surely the whole reason of watching boxing is to learn the sweet science, so why would you support fighters who dont provide this? Or is there another reason why people passionately defend fighters that are exciting? For those who are massive fans of safety last, postive fighters, please tell us why that is....
pls no trolling, i'll put you on ignore!
Boxers have different skill sets, if you're a brawler/aggressor doesn't directly mean you don't practice the sweet science.
Mayweather is really good at it, but turns most casuals off. But he also has the character, and does twice the work outside the ring to attract viewers.
If you're a boring guy inside the ring, the best thing you can do to help up you're career is to promote the fight and promote yourself.
Comment
-
The reason is many of the so called exciting fighters are not exciting when it counts most.
Take Manny Pacquio. Most label him exciting. In his biggest, highest profile, most watched fight of his career, he was terribly boring. He threw very few punches and didn't try to win.
Take Sergei kovalev, another guy called exciting. In his biggest fight he was so flustered by skill that he did more holding and clinching them he ever did. He also got tired which allowed the other guy to win rounds and steal a fight he had a huge lead in.
Exciting fighters seem to be exciting only when they are in with guys they are much better then. Frankly, most real boxing fans don't find one sided beatings of easy opponents exciting. In fact, the TS only calls fights like these exciting when the guy that wins is on HBO.
Any sport needs its participants to be highly skilled for the sport to be better. What kind of fan wants to see a sport where none of the players have any skills?
Let's hope guys like Errol Spence keep working on their skill so they don't become the kind of exciting fighter that whines and makes excuses when they lose to a better fighter who took the time to develop his skills.Last edited by The Big Dunn; 06-09-2017, 03:49 AM.
Comment
-
Comment