Do a lot of Russians attend Kovalev fights? I imagine a lot of fan confrontations and

[buge]

Can you name one successful slave revolt besides the one that took place in Haiti? Let me help you out.




What you got?

Maybe you should read the article and skip the cliff notes. Your own link says that the ****** in Haiti were freed YEARS PRIOR to Haiti being its own country. The ****** were freed since France was hoping to gain them as soldiers, while there was a minor rebellion.

This backfired when the French trained the ex-****** who would later come back to lead other former ****** in a war of independence.

It was also only possible because France was overextended in wars on multiple fronts and was 4000+ miles away in a time of slow travel.

There are countless examples of ****** who were taken in battle and freed by fighting their captors, often with the help of other non-slave countrymen. Much of what is now Europe involved this with tribes taking other tribes as ****** until the captors were beaten back and the former ****** were freed. The Barbary Coast ******s did this for centuries to Europeans, etc. I'm sure the same thing happened in sub-Saharan Africa among their tribes, although they didn't have any developed culture to record much for posterity.

[buge]

Only a fan of Donny Tiny Hands Trump is dumb enough to believe freedom was handed to Black people..

You are an idiot. Freedom was given to black people, not taken by them ... I suppose you think that the blacks freed the ****** in the civil war, or maybe it is that walking around whining (MLK) hoping people see you on tv and feel sorry for you is fighting for your freedom.

[iamboxing]

Russians have ice in their veins, they're not easily rattled and couldn't give a ****. Also, they're predominately white but the least racist in Europe - ask anyone on the continent. In terms of racism...those you'd think would be the more racist are less so: Russians, Germans, Swedes. After Brexit England is the most racist right now, imagine the 1980s "****-bashing" x 10 and substitute gypsies, eastern europeans for Pakistanis.

[Kigali]

You are an idiot. Freedom was given to black people, not taken by them ... I suppose you think that the blacks freed the ****** in the civil war, or maybe it is that walking around whining (MLK) hoping people see you on tv and feel sorry for you is fighting for your freedom.

Typical Trump cuck nonsense.

I bet you're not even a registered voter

[travestyny]

Maybe you should read the article and skip the cliff notes. Your own link says that the ****** in Haiti were freed YEARS PRIOR to Haiti being its own country. The ****** were freed since France was hoping to gain them as soldiers, while there was a minor rebellion.

This backfired when the French trained the ex-****** who would later come back to lead other former ****** in a war of independence.

It was also only possible because France was overextended in wars on multiple fronts and was 4000+ miles away in a time of slow travel.

There are countless examples of ****** who were taken in battle and freed by fighting their captors, often with the help of other non-slave countrymen. Much of what is now Europe involved this with tribes taking other tribes as ****** until the captors were beaten back and the former ****** were freed. The Barbary Coast ******s did this for centuries to Europeans, etc. I'm sure the same thing happened in sub-Saharan Africa among their tribes, although they didn't have any developed culture to record much for posterity.

You can't read well, can you? They were "FREED" because they kicked the French out of the country twice. They then proceeded to massacre many of the whites there and had them running for the hills. They also kicked the Spanish and English out of the country. France got its ass kicked, then decided to free the ****** so that the Spanish or English wouldn't take the colony, then after both were defeated, France got it's ass kicked again because they got played. You must have missed the part where Napoleon tried to put the people back into slavery, huh? This was a successful slave revolt where the ****** took their freedom. They weren't given shlt. If you have any other information about that, prove it!

I've read a book well over 1000 pages on this. Perhaps it's YOU who should skip the cliff notes!

[travestyny]

You are an idiot. Freedom was given to black people, not taken by them ... I suppose you think that the blacks freed the ****** in the civil war, or maybe it is that walking around whining (MLK) hoping people see you on tv and feel sorry for you is fighting for your freedom.

Are you saying there weren't black troops during the American civil war? You really need to pick up some books, bro!


By the way, MLK was fighting for civil rights, not freedom. ****** were free 100 years before MLK.

[Kigali]

Are you saying there weren't black troops during the American civil war? You really need to pick up some books, bro!


By the way, MLK was fighting for civil rights, not freedom. ****** were free 100 years before MLK.

You don't expect a Trump stan to read books do you?

Come on now.

He's a member of the willfully ignorant.

I bet he's not even a registered voter...or white.

[Kigali]

You can't read well, can you? They were "FREED" because they kicked the French out of the country twice. They then proceeded to massacre many of the whites there and had them running for the hills. They also kicked the Spanish and English out of the country. France got its ass kicked, then decided to free the ****** so that the Spanish or English wouldn't take the colony, then after both were defeated, France got it's ass kicked again because they got played. You must have missed the part where Napoleon tried to put the people back into slavery, huh? This was a successful slave revolt where the ****** took their freedom. They weren't given shlt. If you have any other information about that, prove it!

I've read a book well over 1000 pages on this. Perhaps it's YOU who should skip the cliff notes!

[buge]

You can't read well, can you? They were "FREED" because they kicked the French out of the country twice. They then proceeded to massacre many of the whites there and had them running for the hills. They also kicked the Spanish and English out of the country. France got its ass kicked, then decided to free the ****** so that the Spanish or English wouldn't take the colony, then after both were defeated, France got it's ass kicked again because they got played. You must have missed the part where Napoleon tried to put the people back into slavery, huh? This was a successful slave revolt where the ****** took their freedom. They weren't given shlt. If you have any other information about that, prove it!

I've read a book well over 1000 pages on this. Perhaps it's YOU who should skip the cliff notes!

You know nothing. In the article you linked, it says directly in it that Haiti didn't have independence until YEARS AFTER the ****** were freed.

1789 - French revolution, declared all men equal ... Haitian free blacks started a small insurgency (300 man army) since they figured it should also apply to them
1791 - slave rebellion
1792 - ****** have 1/3 of country (entire country is only the size of Hawaii though)
1792 - ****** freed, 2/3 of country still under control of French
1794 - ****** freed again (GB had placed some back under slavery)
1795-1801 various battles
1802 - Haiti blacks surrender to the French
1802 - Haiti rebels again (note, nobody was a slave)
1803 - French in Haiti surrender to GB (had been battling them throughout the world, and GB cut off all supplies to Haiti)
1803 - GB leaves Haiti
1804 - Haiti declares independence

Haiti blacks then killed all the remaining whites (even those who were against slavery), and has been a hellhole ever since the blacks have run it. Big surprise.

A large part of the reason Haiti ended up being independent is because GB ran the French out. GB had no vested interest in the colony and left it.

[travestyny]

You know nothing. In the article you linked, it says directly in it that Haiti didn't have independence until YEARS AFTER the ****** were freed.

1789 - French revolution, declared all men equal ... Haitian free blacks started a small insurgency (300 man army) since they figured it should also apply to them
1791 - slave rebellion
1792 - ****** have 1/3 of country (entire country is only the size of Hawaii though)
1792 - ****** freed, 2/3 of country still under control of French
1794 - ****** freed again (GB had placed some back under slavery)
1795-1801 various battles
1802 - Haiti blacks surrender to the French
1802 - Haiti rebels again (note, nobody was a slave)
1803 - French in Haiti surrender to GB (had been battling them throughout the world, and GB cut off all supplies to Haiti)
1803 - GB leaves Haiti
1804 - Haiti declares independence

Haiti blacks then killed all the remaining whites (even those who were against slavery), and has been a hellhole ever since the blacks have run it. Big surprise.

A large part of the reason Haiti ended up being independent is because GB ran the French out. GB had no vested interest in the colony and left it.

The Haitian Revolution was a successful anti-slavery and anti-colonial insurrection by self-liberated ****** against French colonial rule in Saint-Domingue, now the sovereign nation of Haiti.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haitian_Revolution

Jesus Christ. I thought you said to stop reading the cliff notes. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THE **** YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. STOP PRETENDING TO! GIVING DATES DOES NOT TELL THE STORY OF WHY ALL OF THE SHlT THAT HAPPENED, HAPPENED.

The ****** rebelled and later decided to enlist Spain to help them out with guns and ammunition. Spain agreed to help because they would love a chance to steal the colony away from France. THIS WAS, AT THAT TIME, THE MOST PROFITABLE COLONY IN THE WORLD. The Whites in Saint Domingue enlisted England to help them out. Both Spain, along with the ******, and England were fighting against the French. Because France was getting their asses kicked, they were FORCED to give into the ****** demands and free the ******, because otherwise they knew they would lose the colony to Spain or England. When the slave leaders heard that France was willing to accept freeing the ******, they switched allegiances, noting that Spain and England both had Kings, while France just went through with the French Revolution declaring that all men were equal. So the ****** turned on Spain and began kicking their asses until they kicked them off the island. They also kicked England's ass and kicked them off the island. They agreed that they would be an independent state but linked to France. Then Napoleon took over France, and he decided to reinstitute slavery. He sent over troops to get the job done, and the ****** kicked their asses and sent them off the island. Story done.

You are trying to portray it as the ****** were given freedom. NOT TRUE. The ****** forced France's hand and strategically made alliances, using France, England and Spain like dopes to their advantage. AS YOU CAN SEE, IN THE END, NEITHER SPAIN, FRANCE, NOR ENGLAND CONTROLLED SAINT DOMINGUE. Why the **** do you think that is? BECAUSE THE ****** STRATEGICALLY WHIPPED ALL THEIR ASSES, INCLUDING THE GREAT NAPOLEON, AND KICKED THEM OFF OF THE FVKCING ISLAND. THESE ARE FACTS!


WHY THE **** WOULD GB AGREE TO WORK WITH THE WHITES THERE, FIGHT AGAINST FRANCE, AND THEN JUST LEAVE. WHAT THE **** WOULD BE THE POINT OF THAT TO GB? DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE TO YOU AT ALL?

The British Prime Minister, William Pitt the Younger believed that the success of the slave revolt in Saint Domigue would inspire slave revolts in the British Caribbean colonies and that taking Saint Domingue, the richest of the French colonies would be a most useful bargaining chip to have when the peace negotiations began to end the war, and the interim, occupying Saint Domingue would mean bringing all of its great wealth into the British treasury.The American journalist James Perry noted that the great irony of the British campaign in Haiti was instead of being the great money-spinner as expected, the campaign ended in a complete debacle that cost the British treasury millions of pounds and the British military thousands upon thousands of dead, all for nothing.

GB not only wanted the colony, but they also wanted to continue slavery there!


AND THE LAST BATTLE WAS NOT AGAINST GB. THE LAST BATTLE WAS the ****** (former ****** after they LIBERATED THEMSELVES, if that seems to make such a difference to you) AGAINST NAPELEON'S FORCES.

The last battle on land of the Haitian Revolution, the Battle of Vertières, occurred on 18 November 1803, near Cap-Haïtien fought between Dessalines' army and the remaining French colonial army under the Vicomte de Rochambeau; the slave rebels and freed revolutionary soldiers won the battle.

GB DIDN'T RUN THE FRENCH OUT. THE ****** RAN THEM OUT AND FORCED THEM TO SURRENDER TO GB ON THEIR WAY OUT, BEING THAT THEY WERE AT WAR WITH GB. The French surrendered to GB TO PREVENT FROM BEING KILLED BY THE HAITAIN ARMY!!! THE FIGHTING ON LAND, AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE QUOTATION ABOVE, WAS DONE BY THE ******, WHO THEN PROMPTLY BEGAN TO MASSACRE THE WHITES LEFT THERE.

THE FEW REMAINING FRENCH-HELD TOWNS ALL SURRENDERED TO THE ****** BY THE END OF 1803. INDEPENDENCE WAS OFFICIALLY DECLARED JANUARY 1ST, 1804!

Is your only beef that they should be considered former ****** because they already won their freedom, even though they were under constant threat of being made to return to slavery??? Whoa, great job. LOSING IN THE END WOULD HAVE MEANT A RETURN TO SLAVERY!

DO SOME ****ING REAL RESEARCH!