So is more relevant the title reign of Brook because he defended the title three times with the best against Frankie Fraking Gavin than beating Lemeiux just because he didn't defended?.
So just because Jacobs isn't a lineal champion the win is under the three superb defenses of Special K against that murderers row?, despite the fact that Jacobs stopped Peter Quillin in one round who never lost his world title in the ring.
So just because Jacobs isn't a lineal champion the win is under the three superb defenses of Special K against that murderers row?, despite the fact that Jacobs stopped Peter Quillin in one round who never lost his world title in the ring.

Comment