Oh you're missing my point man (or I'm not making myself clear)
The point is that WBC gave plenty of notice that they were calling in the mandatory. Both Cotto and Canelo knew full well that they had to defend against Golovkin next or vacate so there is nothing to cry about from Canelos side. They're acting like they got singled out and treated unfairly by the WBC so now they're gonna take their ball and go home.
My point really doesn't have anything to do with Golovkin it's just that he was the mandatory. The mandatory could have been anyone and it's the same thing.
The point is that WBC gave plenty of notice that they were calling in the mandatory. Both Cotto and Canelo knew full well that they had to defend against Golovkin next or vacate so there is nothing to cry about from Canelos side. They're acting like they got singled out and treated unfairly by the WBC so now they're gonna take their ball and go home.
My point really doesn't have anything to do with Golovkin it's just that he was the mandatory. The mandatory could have been anyone and it's the same thing.
Comment