GGG haters you can't have it both way with brook

[Larry the boss]

It is also Spence's only best win. Now what?

I want to know how GGG and Spence now stand in your eyes.

GGG is 35..Spence is in his twenties....

[Raonic]

GGG is 35..Spence is in his twenties....

That didn't answer the question. I asked you where they stand as a fighter now. Is GGG still bad or is Spence now good? Where do both rank in the top p4p rankings? Where do they rank in their divisions with their win?

Because if Kell Brook is a bum, and if you beat a bum at 35 or you beat a bum at 27, you still beat a bum. Him being 27 doesn't excuse him for beating a bum, which would mean he is not good.

[-Kev-]

Your analogy was way off and had nothing to do with the thread. You're clearly confused right now and not making any sense at all.

And I've already proved my point. Not sure what you're whining about.

Just stop, your thread sucks, it's ****** and makes no sense, you have no deductive reasoning skills (you can't see the rest of my initial post and realize what I meant). You have been abandoned. You look like a troll who's trolling to make GGG look bad. Anyone who comes to your aide here will just fall into the hole you've created for yourself.

Spence beating Brook at 147 is a better win than GGG beating Brook at 160. Your thread is dumb and your friends can't help you. You're arguing here all alone like a dumbass just getting pummeled for your stubbornness and ******ity.

[satiev1]

Just stop, your thread sucks, it's ****** and makes no sense, you have no deductive reasoning skills (you can't see the rest of my initial post and realize what I meant). You have been abandoned. You look like a troll who's trolling to make GGG look bad. Anyone who comes to your aide here will just fall into the hole you've created for yourself.

Spence beating Brook at 147 is a better win than GGG beating Brook at 160. Your thread is dumb and your friends can't help you. You're arguing here all alone like a dumbass just getting pummeled for your stubbornness and ******ity.

GGG beat an undefeated brooke coming off a big win and spence beat a brook coming off a ko loss. There was not a big size discrepancy between ggg and brook. That's a fact. And you can't downplay one guy's win against the same opponent and hold the other one in high regard regardless of weight. It makes you look like a biased fan boy.

If you think brook was the same fighter that fought ggg then you're an idiot.

[b00g13man]

Thread fail

GGG is 35..Spence is in his twenties....

lol

[Madison Boxing]

I praised Spence for showing you clowns Brook is nothing special..we told ya'll he would **** this guy up

**** him up? spence was losing after 7 rounds lol. you make it sound like it was a demolition job.

[Madison Boxing]

worst thing is they are downright lying, got people genuinely saying spence did a better job. what the hell did you guys watch lol, ggg wobbled him bad in round 1 and got him out in 5, think he outlanded him in every round apart from 1. spence gets him out in 11 rounds after a very competitive first half to the fight, but that somehow exposes GGG's performance?