That was a dam good version of Kell Brook that Spence beat.
Collapse
-
lmao the same guys who lambasted PAC for facing guys coming off loses are now praising Spence for beating a good fighter who was pummelled in his last fight against the strongest middleweight on the planet, you can't make this shyt up.Comment
-

That's true dedication, we have our disagreements but you're a true fan and student of the game
Comment
-
Brook looked awesome for as long as he lasted doing well.
Spence had subtle movements and sneaked in enough body shots I felt early that it eventually wore Brook down. If it wasn't for the early investment I think Brook might of still had enough late game to pull it out.Comment
-
Kell looked about as good as he can look at WW. I think he needs to move up though the weight cuts do not help and i believe he would be a better fighter at 154 or maybe even 160 over time. He honestly looked better to me vs GGG he looked fresher and more healthy. Not discrediting spence though he beat a prime version of brook.Comment
-
i dont want to take any credit away from spence cause he did a great job and deserves the plaudits, but brook did lack some of the sharpness and snap in his punches. looked slower at welter than he did at middle lol.Comment
-
You don't have to make it up, just log in to NSB and read the same guys calling Kell Brook a **** bum 9 months ago when he fought a certain other guy call him a prime beast after their new love beats him Saturday night. It's pure comedyComment
-
You might be under that impression because Spence is a lot quicker than GolovkinComment
-
That's because he fought a faster fighter. GGG is slow, though he is sharp. Kell's speed was troubling until GGG started to control him on the ropes. Doesn't matter how fast you are if there is no where to go.
Ahh, thank you, but it's not that commendable bro lol. I just finally finished classes and I don't like to talk about fighters without giving them their just do..Last edited by SkillspayBills; 05-28-2017, 05:15 PM.Comment
Comment