Actually odds have zero to do with probability,the odds are only based on who bookies perceive the public favors,I said the same thing before the jacobs fight that jacobs is nowhere near the underdog they were making him & that that fight was actually 60/40. I told everyone on many sites that if lemule can last 7 rds theres no way jacobs gets ko'd like everyone esp. Jez-abel sanchez was claiming in 5-8 rds. I even said That by fight time gigi would only be a 5-1 favorite,I ended up right.
When the bookies make a line their only doing it based on a goal of getting almost even action on both fighters,w. the underdog getting the most bets slightly. That way the bookies don't go bankrupt no matter who loses. Canelo is only a slight underdog in that a bet on him of $100 will yield 140$,thats not a big underdog,that just means the bookies expect a slight edge to gigi & that they perceive the public to slightly favor gigi,due to canelo not fighting at 160 before.
Spence is listed as a much bigger favorite over brook,despite him never having fought a decent opponent,& fighting in the Uk where Brits are given gifts regularly over others.
When the bookies make a line their only doing it based on a goal of getting almost even action on both fighters,w. the underdog getting the most bets slightly. That way the bookies don't go bankrupt no matter who loses. Canelo is only a slight underdog in that a bet on him of $100 will yield 140$,thats not a big underdog,that just means the bookies expect a slight edge to gigi & that they perceive the public to slightly favor gigi,due to canelo not fighting at 160 before.
Spence is listed as a much bigger favorite over brook,despite him never having fought a decent opponent,& fighting in the Uk where Brits are given gifts regularly over others.

Comment