Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Sanchez: When Golovkin Goes To 168, Jacobs Will Be Dominant

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by kushking View Post
    Who cares if jacobs didnt do ibf weigh in for a belt he didn't have,this was a unification fight to become wba full champ,only gigi groupies criticize someone for rehydrating when gigi himself rehydrates to 175 easy,& if he was allowed to weigh 169.5 & did weigh that on morning of the fight weigh in,he had plenty of time to rehydrate a few lbs more,& hes never weighed more than 176 anyways. Its just Imbecilic to call jacobs a lhw based on rehydrating to 180 & call gigi a mw when he rehydrates to 176,stop being ******.

    well said !!

    that really is an absurd bottom-of-the-barrel excuse

    what happened to all that " 154-168 " bullshht ?

    if there is an ounce of truth in that excuse..... then Golovkin should stop talking about 168, and they sure as hell should never mention Andre Ward ever again

    Comment


    • #82
      ft see

      Originally posted by ThomasJK View Post
      GGG clearly beat Daniel Jacobs at 160, and GGG will beat Daniel Jacobs at 168. I hope there is a rematch regardless of what weight class they fight at. Honestly, I don't think GGG wanted to hurt Danny, otherwise he would have invested more to the body instead of head hunting like he did. Golovkin had DJ in survival mode the last three rounds and DJ was throwing everything but the kitchen sink to keep GGG off of him. Then collapses on the ropes after the final bell looking like he was praying to God and giving thanks that the fight was over. This is one of those cases where I wish they would bring back the 15 round fights. But now after all the negativity and whining by DJ, GGG may not be as kind the second go round and decide to really take it to another level Danny has never seen or felt before. I like Daniel Jacobs, but I'm more interested in seeing who he's going to fight next, and put this last defeat behind him and more forward with his career. Has anyone heard any news or gossip about any future possible opponents for Daniel Jacobs??
      He should get active ASAP to build in his unexpected showing against Golovkin. He's an entertaining fighter with a compelling back story.

      Comment


      • #83
        ft see

        Originally posted by ThomasJK View Post
        GGG clearly beat Daniel Jacobs at 160, and GGG will beat Daniel Jacobs at 168. I hope there is a rematch regardless of what weight class they fight at. Honestly, I don't think GGG wanted to hurt Danny, otherwise he would have invested more to the body instead of head hunting like he did. Golovkin had DJ in survival mode the last three rounds and DJ was throwing everything but the kitchen sink to keep GGG off of him. Then collapses on the ropes after the final bell looking like he was praying to God and giving thanks that the fight was over. This is one of those cases where I wish they would bring back the 15 round fights. But now after all the negativity and whining by DJ, GGG may not be as kind the second go round and decide to really take it to another level Danny has never seen or felt before. I like Daniel Jacobs, but I'm more interested in seeing who he's going to fight next, and put this last defeat behind him and more forward with his career. Has anyone heard any news or gossip about any future possible opponents for Daniel Jacobs??
        He should get active ASAP to build on his unexpected showing against Golovkin. He's an entertaining fighter with a compelling back story.

        Comment


        • #84
          What if Jacobs moves to 168 an hour later K2 announces the move?

          Comment


          • #85
            What if Jacobs was elite but written off because he got knocked out as a prospect and dropped by Mora... What if he's like the Badou Jack of middleweights...

            Comment


            • #86
              is alvarez the slow flat footed guy who tried jabbing mayweather to death?

              oh my bad who is Sanchez?
              Last edited by IcantReadYEAHHH; 08-11-2017, 03:33 PM.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by _Maxi View Post
                Do I belong to the 1% that expected Jacobs to win 5 rounds and that people would ask for a rematch?

                No, that's just not truth, you are BSing. I think many people said Jacobs would make it a close fight.









                A lot of people said before the fight that this would be a close fight. Skill wise GGG is better but Jacobs is bigger, younger and hungrier. It was obvious it was gonna be close.
                I predicted a very close fight with Golovkin having a slight advantage. I thought people were being fools for underestimating Jacobs. The results weren't surprising.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Originally posted by Mammoth View Post
                  What if Jacobs was elite but written off because he got knocked out as a prospect and dropped by Mora... What if he's like the Badou Jack of middleweights...
                  THAT is exactly what happened.

                  Jacobs is a damn good fighter! He should be out there fighting. We need to see more of him. Mora dropping him is insignificant because it was a flash knockdown.....It was funny though

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Damn Wicked View Post
                    THAT is exactly what happened.

                    Jacobs is a damn good fighter! He should be out there fighting. We need to see more of him. Mora dropping him is insignificant because it was a flash knockdown.....It was funny though
                    Lol yeah it was. He ****d Mora in the rematch though...

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      So "154-168" easy I see... damn Abel, why so late going to 168?

                      You're saying Jacobs will stay at 160 or he will move to 168 with Golovkin? Meaning Jacobs will be dominant at 168?

                      Why wouldn't you blast Jacobs to move at 168 in press statements? Oh that's right, you want to convince Rozier and Jacobs that 160 is a favor

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP