Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Notice We Have No Problem w TC 147 fantasy but GGG no!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    I'd like to see Crawford fight the best opponent possible, I really don't care about Indongo, he's just not that great of a boxer. I'm more of a P4P guy, trinkets aren't my thing. Talent pool is too thin outside of a handful of divisions.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
      The HBO guys mentioned Thurman but mentioned nothing about his injury. You really want him to wait until Thurman has healed and has a comeback fight?
      What are you saying, you would rather he fight Thurman while he is not 100%?

      Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
      Anyone who's even entertaining that fight should be killed, especially if they're GGG fans. Fans of campers should keep the name of 5 division champions out of their mouths.
      Using your logic I guess Crawford should keep the name of an 8 division champ out of his mouth.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
        Using your logic I guess Crawford should keep the name of an 8 division champ out of his mouth.
        Struggling with analogies I see.

        Crawford is a 2 division champ with sights on a third one. Neither he or his fans advocate camping. And he's not chasing down, but up.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by KingHippo View Post
          Struggling with analogies I see.

          Crawford is a 2 division champ with sights on a third one. Neither he or his fans advocate camping.
          I'm not struggling with anything, you are struggling with reality. What's good enough for one fighter is good enough for another. Keep your double standards in check.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
            What are you saying, you would rather he fight Thurman while he is not 100%?



            Using your logic I guess Crawford should keep the name of an 8 division champ out of his mouth.
            What he's trying to say is that TC - the 2 Division champ - has realistic hypotheticals because he has deserved it at 29 years of age, win or lose.

            Whereas when everybody, especially me made threads about 168 matchups, it was forbidden to talk about!

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by Mirko Troll Cop View Post
              What he's trying to say is that TC - the 2 Division champ - has realistic hypotheticals because he has deserved it at 29 years of age, win or lose.

              Whereas when everybody, especially me made threads about 168 matchups, it was forbidden to talk about!
              It wasn't forbidden it just wasn't realistic. All that nonsense about GGG ducking Ward at 168 when in fact no one was made an official offer and neither side say down for negotiations. It was a mythical match up and both sides accused the other of ducking. Fans of each will side with their guy in the never-ending argument over who avoided who.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                It wasn't forbidden it just wasn't realistic. All that nonsense about GGG ducking Ward at 168 when in fact no one was made an official offer and neither side say down for negotiations. It was a mythical match up and both sides accused the other of ducking. Fans of each will side with their guy in the never-ending argument over who avoided who.
                What are you talking about? Ward? DeGale, Jack, Ramirez were the ones mentioned.

                Nice alt. This isn't about Ward, as much as you try. Should I bring up Benavidez vs GGG at 168? Or just bring up Ward?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by GhostofDempsey View Post
                  What are you saying, you would rather he fight Thurman while he is not 100%?



                  Using your logic I guess Crawford should keep the name of an 8 division champ out of his mouth.
                  No, i'm asking do you want TC to wait that long to go to WW.

                  The fights with thurman and Spence (if he wins) will be very difficult to make. Why not just make the easier fight?

                  I'm curious about something. You posted think Crawford would be cautious against Manny and thus the fight would be boring,

                  Spence, Brook and Thurman are bigger, younger and have more KO's at WW than Manny. Would Crawford be cautious against them?

                  It seems more likely that Crawford would be more cautious with the bigger, younger, stronger men. Crawford also hasn't fought anyone on these guys level. Yet you haven't suggested any of these fights would be boring and are calling for them?

                  Why the difference?

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                    No, i'm asking do you want TC to wait that long to go to WW.

                    The fights with thurman and Spence (if he wins) will be very difficult to make. Why not just make the easier fight?

                    I'm curious about something. You posted think Crawford would be cautious against Manny and thus the fight would be boring,

                    Spence, Brook and Thurman are bigger, younger and have more KO's at WW than Manny. Would Crawford be cautious against them?

                    It seems more likely that Crawford would be more cautious with the bigger, younger, stronger men. Crawford also hasn't fought anyone on these guys level. Yet you haven't suggested any of these fights would be boring and are calling for them?

                    Why the difference?
                    First, Crawford needs to decide if he wants to unify 140 or go up to 147 and fight Manny. I seem to recall all the GGG haters riding him because he didn't unify 160 with Saunders but instead chose to fight Canelo for the money fight. Do they offer Crawford the same criticism?

                    I have my doubts about whether or not Bud will ever fight the likes of Spence, Porter or Brook. I think he sees Thurman as an easier option and perhaps a safer one given his style, which yes--a Crawford/Thurman fight would not be fun to watch.

                    There are too many unanswered questions about Crawford. He has thus far impressed, but we have to consider the caliber of fighter's he has been in with before we start chanting he is the next coming of SRR.

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by The Big Dunn View Post
                      No, i'm asking do you want TC to wait that long to go to WW.

                      The fights with thurman and Spence (if he wins) will be very difficult to make. Why not just make the easier fight?

                      I'm curious about something. You posted think Crawford would be cautious against Manny and thus the fight would be boring,

                      Spence, Brook and Thurman are bigger, younger and have more KO's at WW than Manny. Would Crawford be cautious against them?

                      It seems more likely that Crawford would be more cautious with the bigger, younger, stronger men. Crawford also hasn't fought anyone on these guys level. Yet you haven't suggested any of these fights would be boring and are calling for them?

                      Why the difference?
                      That's because you're conversing with a Spoon alt, to protect and conserve Pac from discussion and the possibility of losing, so create scenarios to keep PAC boy out of danger

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP