Ryota Murata vs Hassan N'Dam "title fight"??

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GreenMan93
    Up and Comer
    Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
    • Apr 2017
    • 79
    • 5
    • 0
    • 6,201

    #1

    Ryota Murata vs Hassan N'Dam "title fight"??

    "held their final press conference to decide the regular WBA World Middleweight champion"

    Wtf... I thought this "title" was eliminated when Golovkin beat Jacobs. I thought the WBA was trying to eliminate their multiple titles in each division and that fight should have done just that. So why is it all of a sudden "vacant" now and being contested for? Any ideas?
  • Eff Pandas
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Apr 2012
    • 52131
    • 3,624
    • 2,147
    • 1,635,919

    #2
    Its so cute when 2017ers come in here trying to make sense of abc group title stuff.

    Comment

    • Randall Cunning
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2015
      • 6041
      • 163
      • 30
      • 84,599

      #3
      Pretty sure Jacobs had to give up the WBA belt a month before the Golovkin fight

      Comment

      • GMAN SUPREME
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2014
        • 5974
        • 160
        • 26
        • 13,658

        #4
        wba are the ***ing worst. these idiots don't know what they are doing from one minute to the next

        Comment

        • Pigeons
          Banned
          Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
          • Jun 2013
          • 14752
          • 1,211
          • 714
          • 37,430

          #5
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas
          Its so cute when 2017ers come in here trying to make sense of abc group title stuff.

          Comment

          • The Time
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Mar 2010
            • 2604
            • 67
            • 39
            • 9,702

            #6
            It's silly yes it is.

            The only thing I can think of is, after Jacobs lost to Golovkin, since Golovkin is the Super WBA Middleweight Champion that he can't be both the Super and Regular Champion.

            So the WBA "Regular" belt became vacant for the next top two contenders Murata and N'Dam.

            That's the only thing I can think of.

            But this Super Champion and Regular Champion stuff is dumb, pretty ******.

            There should just be one champion. But these sanctioning bodies always look for new ways to money grab.


            I don't recall anything about eliminating that bogus Regular title. But if anyone has seen an article on it, then yes please share your info.
            Last edited by The Time; 05-18-2017, 07:15 PM.

            Comment

            • GMAN SUPREME
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2014
              • 5974
              • 160
              • 26
              • 13,658

              #7
              Originally posted by The Time
              It's silly yes it is.

              The only thing I can think of is, after Jacobs lost to Golovkin, since Golovkin is the Super WBA Middleweight Champion that he can't be both the Super and Regular Champion.

              So the WBA "Regular" belt became vacant for the next top two contenders Murata and N'Dam.

              That's the only thing I can think of.

              But this Super Champion and Regular Champion stuff is dumb, pretty ******.

              There should just be one champion. But these sanctioning bodies always look for new ways to money grab.


              I don't recall anything about eliminating that bogus Regular title. But if anyone has seen an article on it, then yes please share your info.
              actually the wba said they would be getting rid of those extra belts like the "regular" belt after ggg defeated jacobs leaving only one. its all about those sanctioning fees though so I doubt they will actually go through with it.

              Comment

              • GreenMan93
                Up and Comer
                Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                • Apr 2017
                • 79
                • 5
                • 0
                • 6,201

                #8
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas
                Its so cute when 2017ers come in here trying to make sense of abc group title stuff.
                Whatever dude it was just a simple question. I recall the WBA saying they are eliminating titles and thats why they were enforcing more mandatories than usual. Was just wondering if anybody heard anything from the WBA president or anything on the situation. I figured somebody who is on boxing forums 24/7 365 ie. ,you, would maybe have an answer.

                Comment

                • GreenMan93
                  Up and Comer
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Apr 2017
                  • 79
                  • 5
                  • 0
                  • 6,201

                  #9
                  Originally posted by The Time
                  It's silly yes it is.

                  The only thing I can think of is, after Jacobs lost to Golovkin, since Golovkin is the Super WBA Middleweight Champion that he can't be both the Super and Regular Champion.

                  So the WBA "Regular" belt became vacant for the next top two contenders Murata and N'Dam.

                  That's the only thing I can think of.

                  But this Super Champion and Regular Champion stuff is dumb, pretty ******.

                  There should just be one champion. But these sanctioning bodies always look for new ways to money grab.


                  I don't recall anything about eliminating that bogus Regular title. But if anyone has seen an article on it, then yes please share your info.
                  I thought it was the "regular" belt that whey were trying to eliminate. Do you know what other belts the WBA was trying to eliminate? Because I know they got the "interim" belt "champion" also.

                  Comment

                  • Eff Pandas
                    Banned
                    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                    • Apr 2012
                    • 52131
                    • 3,624
                    • 2,147
                    • 1,635,919

                    #10
                    Originally posted by GreenMan93
                    Whatever dude it was just a simple question. I recall the WBA saying they are eliminating titles and thats why they were enforcing more mandatories than usual. Was just wondering if anybody heard anything from the WBA president or anything on the situation. I figured somebody who is on boxing forums 24/7 365 ie. ,you, would maybe have an answer.
                    Don't get all upset 2017er.

                    Since you are apparently new to boxing you should know multiple abc f#ckery has been going on for the last 4 decades & change at an impressive rate. Nothing is changing anytime soon.

                    Its best to not even give a f#ck about who has what title & when they will have to defend it or be stripped or what caliber a championship they hold or how anyone can unify all the titles & keep them for any length of time without fighting undeserving bs mandatory's all the time & about 50 other bs things involved with abc groups.

                    Just concern yourself with who's the best in the division & consider that guy the champ & neither of these mfers is THE CHAMP so no one should give a f#ck about whatever bs "title" will or won't be on the line.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP