Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GGG has literally won ONE TITLE IN THE RING..ONE!!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by boxinggod101 View Post
    Bigdramashow said that Errol Spence is overrated so Larry went at GGG jugular.

    U know.. groupie vs groupie.
    An eye for an eye
    Blow for blow
    Spence is literally from 2 miles from where I'm from and I'm happy to say he is massively overrated. He's beaten literally nobody so far. Washed up Algerei means jack sh@t

    Comment


    • #72
      Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
      What made you come to that? Mayweather fought Canelo in his 5th weight division. Golovkin is fighting Canelo at his career weight. Mayweathers win over Canelo is much more impressive because he's so much smaller than Golovkin.
      But I asked about pacquaio and your thoughts considering your reason that floyds win over Canelo would be better than if ggg KOd Camelot due to it being his 5th division, where pacquaio has 8 divisions, surely pacquaio a win over margarito would trump floyds win over canelo

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by GriffTannen View Post
        you guys are joking right? lol the regular wba isnt even a real belt.. golovkin "won" it, yet somehow ndam and murata are fighting for it this weekend.. cause it doesnt mean jack shlt
        It means a lot when the guy holding the belt is the 2nd best fighter in the division genius

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
          Broner was NEVER HANDED A TITLE!!! GGG was handed 2
          But Broner was always handed his a$$ when he stepped up to face top 10 guys and GGG wasn't..
          but again GGG was handed his titles doe...

          There was a troll discussing with me that Rid**** Bowe was an undisputed champ blah blah.. You can't be a real champ if you drop your belt, in which case the guy who you dropped it for is declared victorious.. heard of victory by forfeit

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Porter's Dad View Post
            Golovkin should have refused to take the vacant belts when Canelo and Sturm said "no, thank you" after being mandated to fight him, because it's not fair to take belts you didn't win in the ring, and Larry from BoxingScene doesn't like it.

            Meanwhile:



            No, that would Adrien Broner - the 3 (or is it 4) division champion who lost to Maidana and Porter officially, and Quintero, Ponce, Granados, Paulie arguably - and who you anointed the fighter of the decade

            Golovkin is a fantastic fighter, as every boxing fan who isn't an idiot knows. The only question is how great? We will find out.
            No we won't. He is 35 and on the down slide.

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by kafkod View Post
              He drained Canelo doe. Why did a so called ATG need to drain a 22 kid?
              A side doe.. TBE doe..

              Comment


              • #77
                Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                No..Floyd was 36 in his 5th damn division
                You all say ggg is over rated so if he KOs a prime, not weight drained Camelot surely that has to be a better win than floyds, you can't have it both ways, if you see floyds win better because it was his 5th division then you are admitting pacquaio is better than Floyd. Because he accomplished 8 divisions so what is the answer?

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by Boxing Goat View Post
                  It means a lot when the guy holding the belt is the 2nd best fighter in the division genius
                  No it doesn't. It's basically an interm belt. It's as bogus as they come

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Shape up View Post
                    You all say ggg is over rated so if he KOs a prime, not weight drained Camelot surely that has to be a better win than floyds, you can't have it both ways, if you see floyds win better because it was his 5th division then you are admitting pacquaio is better than Floyd. Because he accomplished 8 divisions so what is the answer?
                    They'll say he was weight drained from 164.5 to 160.. Surely you cannot make some people happy, so let's skip this shît fight and watch the real fight of the century Mayweather-McGregor..

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by larryxxx. View Post
                      who are you to say when his prime is?? and he was 153 the fight with Trout so why is 152 draining him?? kill the excuses. He had TO MOVE UP TO FIGHT GGG
                      He was younger, lighter, hadn't filled out, everybody says he's a way better fighter now than when he fought Floyd so if ggg KOs him it would have to be considered a better win

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP