Comments Thread For: Floyd Mayweather, Gervonta Davis: Canelo Will Beat Golovkin

[DocGreenThumb.]

First of all shut your f@ggot ass up pussie. pussie g is a fuucking hyped up fighter who ducked Lara. Lara been calling that clown out for the last 3 years and all pussie g was talking about is fighting his bum ass mandatory fights. That was and is bull shyt, the Brook fight had nothing to do with belts as Brook was moving up two divisions and Canelo is not about the belts.

Pussie g was calling Canelo a business fighter for fighting Khan then his punk ass had Brook move up 13 pounds instead of the 8 pounds Khan moved up. Man I would body bag your bytch ass in this topic all day. But since you are sucking pussie g's dyck put your account on the line f@ggot.

I put my account against yours Canelo will beat pussie g. If you don't want to bet shut your f@ggot ass up.

Gain some balls chavala before talking **** to me punk science to science my ficin ass calling a boxer whos knocked every fighter out who has the balls to fight him except one a pussie what are you like 5. And that duck you root for already showed his true colors handing over his belt go away already ******. Change your name to no knowledge or hater to hater because your posts suck balls like when you get on your knees. ****** PUTA

[DocGreenThumb.]

That's being smart idiot. Being that you probably never fought in the ring before you wouldn't get it. You have to be a complete and udder dumb ass to want and allow yourself to get hit by another person. At the end of the day Floyd is 49-0 and the highest selling PPV fighter. And the same haters like yourself who are calling him "boring" and a runner are the same ones who bought his PPV hoping he would lose.

Man that shyt must hurt. Everyone hates him, he is a runner, he is scared yet his 49-0 and was breaking all the live gate and PPV records. Something not adding up LMAO keep hating chump.

You miss the point again and you say you used to fight daring to be great ****** how hard is that to figure out. Mayweather used to talk about how he was going to go for the knock out and then turn it around and make it a boring defensive fight. Oh I forgot you like fighters who run there mouths how there going to whipp some ass then turn into runners in the ring never wanting to go toe to toe. Save it already shows what type of fighter you were when you boxed. Talk shyt then run around the ring the whole fight.

[DocGreenThumb.]

By the way i will take your bet

And i will up the anti 1 ounce of Calis finest lets bet knockouts out too no decisions winner has to knock the other one out. Ok no excuses because we all know GGG is going for the knock out. Don't know about Connello doe.

[rrayvez]

Or Lil G just has to outbox him, something Trout Cotto and Lara failed to do. You're complaining about the score cards but Mayweather won because he won, Lara lost because he lost (a close fight that I personally thought should have been a draw) Cotto lost because he lost and Trout lost because he lost.

None of those cards, changed the outcome of any of the fights. By general consensus the right man won on all those fights.

So your judges theory is already on shaky ground.

not sure how my judges theory is on shaky ground when Canelo consistently gets every benefit of the doubt from certain judges every time he fights. Regardless if you feel the right man won the fight, it doesn't change the fact judges went out of their way to ensure that there was no way these opponents would have had a chance to win without a ko. Also, not so sure that the consensus was that Canelo beat Lara or that Lara "failed to outbox Canelo"

[PranMatic]

Of course he's saying that. He beat Canelo. And there were talks of Floyd fighting GGG at a catchweight. But we all know that wouldn't happened. GGG is too big, too strong. So if Canelo beats GGG. Floyd can finally put an end to the talks of fighting GGG. He has a vested interest in the outcome. Of course he's gonna have a biased opinion.

[SeekDaGreat]

not sure how my judges theory is on shaky ground when Canelo consistently gets every benefit of the doubt from certain judges every time he fights. Regardless if you feel the right man won the fight, it doesn't change the fact judges went out of their way to ensure that there was no way these opponents would have had a chance to win without a ko. Also, not so sure that the consensus was that Canelo beat Lara or that Lara "failed to outbox Canelo"

I explained to you how the judges theory is on shaky ground.

[rrayvez]

I explained to you how the judges theory is on shaky ground.

Well, it was an unsuccessful attempt based on faulty logic.

[hrt3333]

If by some chance it goes to a decision then that's probably the right way to feel.

Idk about having your heart in it though lol

Haha I like GGG a lot better no ****

[BigOneFromCuba]

Canelo can't win unless ggg doesn't stop him, but I don't see that happening. The shot that floored Jacobs will leave canelo hurt, and Canelo couldn't beat jacobs either. Too big to strong with great skill as well.

[Butch.McRae]

Canelo can't win unless ggg doesn't stop him, but I don't see that happening. The shot that floored Jacobs will leave canelo hurt, and Canelo couldn't beat jacobs either. Too big to strong with great skill as well.

You're really exaggerating here. The shot that dropped Jacobs didn't even land cleanly. Jacobs, clearly was caught off balance and fell. There wasn't any solid power behind that shot at all. Just watch the tape. Which is why he got right back up. If GGG would've caught him good he wouldn't have moved so freely afterwards.

I do think Jacobs would beats Canelo, but you're reaching with that Jacobs' punch comparison.