Golovkin can't defend an uppercut, he gets hit with almost every one his opponent throws. Canelo loves throwing uppercuts. How many will Golovkin eat against Canelo?
How many uppercuts will Golovkin eat against Canelo?
Collapse
-
How many uppercuts will Golovkin eat against Canelo?
47019.15%91-1027.66%1311-2019.15%921-304.26%231+29.79%14Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 05-14-2017, 06:37 AM.Tags: None -
Nobody is claiming the guy in my avatar is a top 3 P4P fighter or an ATG.
BTW he didn't lose to a guy with 3 wins and 46 losses check you facts.Last edited by Robbie Barrett; 05-14-2017, 06:49 AM.Comment
-
I'd be more embarrassed about having someone losing to a fighter who is now at 3-46 as my avatar than claiming someone is an ATG when they aren't.
Facts checked:
http://boxrec.com/boxer/643180
He also lost to a guy currently sitting at 6-11:
http://boxrec.com/boxer/607487
Comment
-
Why would it be embarrassing? I don't understand. Should only world level fighters be supported?I'd be more embarrassed about having someone losing to a fighter who is now at 3-46 as my avatar than claiming someone is an ATG when they aren't.
Facts checked:
http://boxrec.com/boxer/643180
He also lost to a guy currently sitting at 6-11:
http://boxrec.com/boxer/607487

Comment
-
Let's not go for a diversion - where were my facts wrong?
It's not embarrassing to support any fighter. Just be prepared to receive some **** for praising one fighter who has some terrible losses (including one to an infamously well known bum in Andy Harris) and then obsessively attacking another who has yet to lose.Comment
-
Diversion you say? Isn't that what you did with your first post? I've never praised him, i actually don't even support him, i just thought his tattoo looked ******ed.Let's not go for a diversion - where were my facts wrong?
It's not embarrassing to support any fighter. Just be prepared to receive some **** for praising one fighter who has some terrible losses (including one to an infamously well known bum in Andy Harris) and then obsessively attacking another who has yet to lose.
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment