Testing Positive For Steroids After A Fight: NC or DQ Loss?

[Rockybigblower]

Too late after the fight....get the tests right beforehand is what i say. Too much controversy about interference if the tests come up afterwards.

[TBear]

Actually the DQ option instead of a no contest is not a bad idea. Neither is losing your purse you would get for the fight.

[Tony Trick-Pony]

I say a DQ loss. I've never agreed with the NC bs. If the guy cheated, then he lost. It doesn't mean the other guy is better or that he couldn't beat him without using the substance, but he DID choose to use it which is a violation of the rules. Therefore, he lost plain and simple. You'd see less of this if it counted as a loss.

[Teetotaler]

For some reason, there's a bunch that haven't been changed.

Tarver-Cunningham
Thompson-Price II
Teper-Ouatah
Teper-Price
Sturm-Chudinov
Browne-Chagaev

Boxing is big ****ing joke really. While I'm at it, let's not forget the guys that tested positive before the fight and the fight still went on.

Morales-Garcia II
Vargas-Salido
Stiverne-Povetkin (Stiverne later pulled out after Povetkin tested positive)
Povetkin-Duhaupas
Plus Mayweather's IV before the Pacquiao fight

And those are just off the top of my head.

Also de la hoya-mosley hasnt been changed

[Pigeons]

Also de la hoya-mosley hasnt been changed

The ones I posted are guys that failed post-fight drug tests.