The only thing slipping is Golovkin fans confidence in the guy.

[Robbie Barrett]

Since he's invented a new nonexistence definition for 'excuse' (and ignored the one he copy/pasted), that should be a long list.

I'd love to see him in a career as an oddsmaker. Who ya got in the big fight?

"Well I'm not gonna factor in recent performances, age, past injuries, strategy, etc. Those are excuses. Lets go with alphabetical order."

I posted the definition of excuse. You're wrong not i.

[////]

They're try to justify a future loss by blaming him being past prime. That is making an excuse. It's quite simple.

FFS i even posted the definition for you and you still don't understand.

Not even you believe the garbage you're saying + you can't even read a dictionary. You're just inferior.

I tried explaining to you how analyzing a fight which hasn't taken place yet isn't "excuse making". It's called information and decision making. Did your parents slam a car door on your head for fun as a child?

Why don't you list the reasons you think Canelo will win? Lets see the "excuses" (literally anything other than alphabetical order or eenie meenie miney mo is an excuse).

[Robbie Barrett]

Not even you believe the garbage you're saying + you can't even read a dictionary. You're just inferior.

I tried explaining to you how analyzing a fight which hasn't taken place yet isn't "excuse making". Did your parents slam a car door on your head for fun as a child?

Why don't you list the reasons you think Canelo will win? Lets see the "excuses" (literally anything other than alphabetical order is an excuse).

Analysing a fight and then saying Canelo could win because Golovkin is past prime is making an excuse in case he loses. You bellend.

You are blaming a loss on him being past prime = Excuse.

[Divine Hammer]

GGG easily steamrolls canelo. EASILY.canelo is smaller and doesnt have the power to keep GGG off of him for 12 rounds. NO.WAY. and canelo is no defensive wizard either. he will succumb to the relentless pressure and power of GGG.

[ironmt]

What a fight, props to both men for stepping up. I believe GGG wins this fight by decision. I think we can all be pretty confident that this super fight will not look anything like the Mayweather/Pacquiao fiasco and thank God for that.

[Real King Kong]

Most fighters don't look as good when facing the best opponents of their career.

There's things that can be guaged independent of the opposition. You know, how a fighter moves, their speed, how they react to their opponent, what kind of snap is on their punches etc...
I swear some of you guys don't even pay attention to half of what's going on in there.

[////]

Analysing a fight and then saying Canelo could win because Golovkin is past prime is making an excuse in case he loses. You bellend.

You are blaming a loss on him being past prime = Excuse.

How does one "blame a loss" which hasn't occurred yet? That's called making a fight prediction based on something they see and being right. Do you get it now?

An excuse would be predicting Golovkin by KO then changing their mind afterwards based on some trivial technicality.

Predicting Golovkin will lose because he's looked past it isn't an "excuse" you bumbling imbecile.

[Robbie Barrett]

How does one "blame a loss" which hasn't occurred yet? That's called making a fight prediction based on something they see and being right. Do you get it now?

An excuse would be predicting Golovkin by KO then changing their mind afterwards based on some trivial technicality.

Predicting Golovkin will lose because he's looked past it isn't an "excuse" you bumbling imbecile.

Where in the definition does it say something has to happen before it's an excuse? You're making your own definition. A prediction is "Canelo could win" adding "because Golovkin is past prime" is the excuse you dumb ****.

Golovkin will lose = Prediction

because he's looked past it = Excuse

[////]

Where in the definition does it say something has to happen before it's an excuse? You're making your own definition. A prediction is "Canelo could win" adding "because Golovkin is past prime" is the excuse you dumb ****.

Golovkin will lose = Prediction

because he's looked past it = Excuse

Who are you picking as the winner and why?

[Tony Trick-Pony]

GGG all the way. Really glad they are getting this fight done. I've been and will be GGG for sure, by stoppage. It's happening.