Gamboa loss not only exposes Gamboa but also Crawford

[mathed]

ive told people this for a while, theres a lot more question marks against crawford than people think.

Yeah, what questions are those, how he's dominated every single boxer he's ever faced?

[Madison Boxing]

Yeah, what questions are those, how he's dominated every single boxer he's ever faced?

whos he faced though. i mean obviously hes a world level fighter but people throwing him in top 5 p4p, they are SURE he is a superstar elite talent. That lightweight division was absolute complete garbage, a few years ago broner tore through them divisions too. 140 is the worst division in boxing now. There is a huge huge huge step up from fighting there to fighting the big dogs at 147. 140 has always been weak traditionally too. And as this thread says, man he didnt look so good against gamboa. People are revising history here too, he was pretty inactive when he fought crawford and was half the size of him. Wasnt some prime gamboa lol.

[.:: JSFD26 ::.]

No way, it all makes complete sense.
Pac got double exposed when Marquez killed him, then ended up getting schooled in his next fight. And, Golovkin got exposed when 90% of his former opponents went on to failure. And, Loma got exposed because the guy who beat him went on to win only 1 of his next 4 fights.

Anyhow, I think that's how we play this game.

I'm having a good laugh seeing how people agree as well as seeing others even bothering to explain anything to TS.

[JJRod]

Even if we ignore the fact that it's 3 years later and Gamboa has stayed inactive comparing how great a fighter is because of the way he beat or fought common opponents doesn't work.
Lucas Matthyssee destroyed Peterson in three rounds while Danny Garcia had a tough fight with Peterson. Yet when Garcia fought Lucas, Garcia won by a good margin.

[AL_Camino]

Crawford has done anything yet , and Gambao was ****** for wasting all those year out of the sport

off topic question. where is that gif of them fine ass ladies on the beach from??

[b00g13man]

Put some actual thought into the next thread you create.

[285Kid]

off topic question. where is that gif of them fine ass ladies on the beach from??

Gif
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i26rePceQLE

Bria Myles
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Bria+Myles

[jmrf4435]

I was more joking with the thread, yeah.
He is obviously good just not P4P top 3 yet.

I think every undefeated fighter is a bit overrated by definition. It's the job of everyone around them, promoter alike to over hype them.

I would say outlandish stuff all day to get fighters and fans to read it or view it.

It sells fights. When people say a guy is overrated, I say "yeah, his promoters basically create his rating" it's all part of the game.

This boxing business rational can be applied to any product, or service in our market place as well. How many times have you bought a product or service and been like "what was this hype all about". We live in smoke and mirror type society, nothing is EVER as it seems to be.

[Sugar Adam Ali]

LMAO

I don't see how either guy gets "exposed" bc gamboa lost..

The dude is 35 years old, chinny, and his reflexes are starting to slip, and he is undersized at 135.. Gamboa kinda reminds me of roy jones 15 years ago. Once the reflexes and explosive "twitch" started to fade with age, they became more vulnerable in fights.. Castallanos basically did what glen johnson did to roy- get up in his arse and make it a rough fight. When you have always fought naturally with hands down, but then reflexes fade and not use to protecting yourself in traditional ways, so you end up just getting tagged repeatedly..

[M Bison]

I've been saying this all along. Crawford has one of the worst resumes of a p4p guy. Only decent opponent he beat was postol. Gamboa was coming up 2 weight classes was 6 inches shorter was outweighed by 25 lbs and had 6-7 inches less in reach. Yet, he was outboxing crawford for the first couple of rds. When he beat gamboa FLO-MO NATION jumped up in joy and said the win puts crawford in the p4p list. JUST LOLLLLLLLLLL. Now gamboa loses to a guy with 11 losses.

Plus Gamboa had a year and a quarter lay-off, It was a troll/joke thread but a lot of what I said is true and it doesn't make Crawford look that good.