Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Claressa Shields vs. Mery Rancier Set Down For June 16

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
    im comparing how they built up kell brook and golivkin and Chavez
    Why would you compare her to those guys? She's the Loma or Rigo of womens boxing. And the womans divisions aren't as deep as the mens division. There isn't a doubt in my mind she coulda won a title in her first pro fight. I think there are at least two girls right now who've done that (that North Korean girl in Katie Taylor's division is one of them) & Shields is better then them & in a weaker division.

    She is on the right track
    I'm not saying she's on the wrong track lol. I'm saying she could be on a better track to maximize her importance to female boxing & outside of boxing. If she had won a title in her first pro fight that's a talk show question for the rest of her life.

    Like i said i have never seen this much hate for a fighter who is just 2-0
    Show me where I'm hating? I'm from Michigan & support all Michigan fighters hell or high water.

    claressa can fight dozens of more bums
    Do you know anything about woman's boxing? There's literally only 27 chicks in Shields' division lol. She can legit clean out her division in 25 more fights. But I suppose you aren't wrong as they are 2 dozen + 1 to fight, although I think probably only half of them could be considered bums to be fair.

    Or C- trolling cuz I can't believe you are actually being legit here unless you are completely misinformed about Shields + womans boxing.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by eff pandas View Post
      why would you compare her to those guys? She's the loma or rigo of womens boxing. And the womans divisions aren't as deep as the mens division. There isn't a doubt in my mind she coulda won a title in her first pro fight. I think there are at least two girls right now who've done that (that north korean girl in katie taylor's division is one of them) & shields is better then them & in a weaker division.



      I'm not saying she's on the wrong track lol. I'm saying she could be on a better track to maximize her importance to female boxing & outside of boxing. If she had won a title in her first pro fight that's a talk show question for the rest of her life.



      Show me where i'm hating? I'm from michigan & support all michigan fighters hell or high water.



      Do you know anything about woman's boxing? There's literally only 27 chicks in shields' division lol. She can legit clean out her division in 25 more fights. But i suppose you aren't wrong as they are 2 dozen + 1 to fight, although i think probably only half of them could be considered bums to be fair.

      Or c- trolling cuz i can't believe you are actually being legit here unless you are completely misinformed about shields + womans boxing.
      if mens boxing is so great and stars like chavez and ggg and brook build their resumes fighting bums why cant women to do it???? I just dont see what you are soo bothered by.... I doubt any of the top women want to get put to sleep by shields yet! Once shields and showtime offer more money then some top fighter might step up.... Until then i hope shilds follows the bumlovkin, brook and chavez blueprint of fighting tomato cans for 5 to 10 years.....

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
        if mens boxing is so great and stars like chavez and ggg and brook build their resumes fighting bums why cant women to do it????
        LMFAO at your obsession with Brook, JCC Jr & GGG. Idek wtf those guys have to do with anything with Shields.

        And dude there are 27 girls in Shields' division. 27 lol. Its worlds different from mens divisions where there can be 1,500+ boxers to 27. Even "deep" womens divisions have like 100ish chicks max. There is no depth to legit pad a record in particular for someone who doesn't need padding.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by eff pandas View Post
          lmfao at your obsession with brook, jcc jr & ggg. Idek wtf those guys have to do with anything with shields.

          And dude there are 27 girls in shields' division. 27 lol. Its worlds different from mens divisions where there can be 1,500+ boxers to 27. Even "deep" womens divisions have like 100ish chicks max. There is no depth to legit pad a record in particular for someone who doesn't need padding.
          those are just a few examples off the top of the head... I could list a few dozen more champs who built there resumes dominating bums if it makes you feel any better lol.... Shields is just following the mens boxing blueprint.... Fight tomoato cans for years and fill your bank account..... Thats how mens boxing has been set up for more than a century.... Its not that complicated

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
            Shields is just following the mens boxing blueprint.... Fight tomoato cans for years and fill your bank account..... Thats how mens boxing has been set up for more than a century.... Its not that complicated
            LOL B- trolling here. Cmon man you can't be serious. You sound like you got butthurt about some conversation with some other guy a day or two ago & still thinking about it cuz nothing you are talking about has relevance to this topic.

            There is no comparison to make between mens boxing & womens boxing. That's a goofy a$$ opinion. There is no depth in womens boxing & even if there was Shields is a f#cking beast & should be on some Loma or Rigo like opposition path to the top.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by eff pandas View Post
              lol b- trolling here. Cmon man you can't be serious. You sound like you got butthurt about some conversation with some other guy a day or two ago & still thinking about it cuz nothing you are talking about has relevance to this topic.

              There is no comparison to make between mens boxing & womens boxing. That's a goofy a$$ opinion. There is no depth in womens boxing & even if there was shields is a f#cking beast & should be on some loma or rigo like opposition path to the top.
              haha man i swear to god im being honest... I just dont see anything wrong with shields fighting bums to start off her career! Even katie taylor debuted against a girl that was 1-10.... Now once again have you heard any top girls at shields weight call her out yet??? Let me know because i missed all these top females calling her out..... I Personally think shields needs a lot of work....she gasses out very fast and loads up on every punch.... i dont care if she fights bums for the first 10 fights.... hell chavez and canelo have dozens of mexican cab drivers on their resumes....

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                That's a bs opponent for Shields. Chick gots 7 wins, but the combined record was 0-35-1 for those 6 opponents (one of them she fought twice) lol. Also its notable one of those 6 opponents without wins she fought she fought a draw against the first time she fought her.

                Shields is too good to be fighting this caliber of opponent. This is the problem with female's boxing. There is lil depth in the lighter division & no depth in the higher weights as this chick is a top ten lady at 168 on boxrec.
                yes, most talent is at the minimum weight classes, like flyweight, bantamweight etc

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
                  kell brooks first 21 opponents had 900 losses combined lmfao... That is the biggest joke in boxing.... Kell brook also had a trilog with a guy who had 200 losses lmfao...

                  Gennady golovkin fought a guy with 1 win and 10 losses for his 4th pro fight lmfao.... So what are you crying about casual?
                  Are you ****ing dumb? What the hell are you talking about ****sucker?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by NYG View Post
                    Are you ****ing dumb? What the hell are you talking about ****sucker?
                    kell brooks first 21 opponents had 900 losses combined lmfao... That is the biggest joke in boxing.... Kell brook also had a trilog with a guy who had 200 losses lmfao...

                    Gennady golovkin fought a guy with 1 win and 10 losses for his 4th pro fight lmfao.... So what are you crying about casual?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by JASON SHAW View Post
                      kell brooks first 21 opponents had 900 losses combined lmfao... That is the biggest joke in boxing.... Kell brook also had a trilog with a guy who had 200 losses lmfao...

                      Gennady golovkin fought a guy with 1 win and 10 losses for his 4th pro fight lmfao.... So what are you crying about casual?
                      Who gives a ****? I mentioned womens boxing, who the **** cares about Brook or GGG? Ignore list ******

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP