Should Joshua Be #1 P4P??

[Larry the boss]

**** no............

[BrometheusBob.]

People put Kovalev right into top 10 after beating old ass Bernard Hopkins, how do you think they're reaching?

Wasn't Hopkins in the top 10 when they fought?

And putting him into the top 10 isn't nearly the same as asking to be #1.

[Rip Chudd]

P4p is a decisive fighter.. they don't get dropped. So hate it or love it that title belongs to LOMACHENKO.

Preach brother!!!!!

[Fists_of_Fury]

P4p is a decisive fighter.. they don't get dropped. So hate it or love it that title belongs to LOMACHENKO.

The guy that lost to a shop worn, 1 dimensional, face 1st brawler not long ago? He was young doe. Low blows doe. What a piss poor resume for a supposed p4p #1 fighter.

[A.K]

The guy that lost to a shop worn, 1 dimensional, face 1st brawler not long ago? He was young doe. Low blows doe. What a piss poor resume for a supposed p4p #1 fighter.

Except he didn't lose and Gary Russell and Walters = good resume

[A.K]

They don't have losses either....

Andre "S.O.G." Ward is the P4P King right now unless "Pretty Boy" Floyd "Money" Mayweather Jr. comes back and those are FACTS!

Like I said p4p fighters don't get dropped kov is higher on the p4p list, just like loma his only loss was a screw job.

[BlakBread904]

holy ****, cant believe im reading this.

word....that's why there a notion of P4P

someone ban this clown...the TS

[NahMean]

#1 P4P usually means boring fighter with a lot of talent.. Maywether and Ward for example.
Being P4P doesn’t mean anything everyone’s P4P is subjective and their own opinion. Mike Tyson was never #1 P4P but he was the most baddass in boxing.. AJ is currently the most baddass fighter in boxing.

[g27region]

So he has to beat Wlad, Fury, Wilder, and Ortiz to get in your p4p? Lmao! Bet you got Golovkin there though even though prior to Jacobs, he aint beat no one, and even the Jacobs victory was a robbery.

Bet you got Kovalev there even though he only beat Hopkins, who was 49 years old.

Bet you got Loma there even though he beat.....no one.

I've said he got to beat Klitschko and some other relevant fighter in the division - Wilder, Ortiz or Fury - any of these guys, not all three of them

I criticize Golovkin for his poor resume all the time. But unlike Joshua, Golovkin was dominating his division for a longer period of time and even though Jacobs win might be a robbery, it's still a win on paper

Kovalev was dominant in his division too, even guys like Campillo was #3 at the time they fought, and I even don't like Kovalev as a person

Loma got 2 great wins - GRJ and Walters, and few average wins like Sosa and Martinez, plus he's the champ in 2 weight classes in less than 10 fights. 5 titleholders in 9 fights but he beat no one, lol ok

These are better accomplishments than beating 41 y.o veteran coming off a loss and long period of inactivity

Why you don't ask me who has Crawford or Mikey Garcia beat though? Or about Rigo, his last and only relevant fight was 4 years ago? You ask only about Lomachenko, Golovkin and Kovalev, that's why I suppose there's agenda behind your words - 90% of posters can't keep it real here

[Sledgeweather17]

I've said he got to beat Klitschko and some other relevant fighter in the division - Wilder, Ortiz or Fury - any of these guys, not all three of them

I criticize Golovkin for his poor resume all the time. But unlike Joshua, Golovkin was dominating his division for a longer period of time and even though Jacobs win might be a robbery, it's still a win on paper

Kovalev was dominant in his division too, even guys like Campillo was #3 at the time they fought, and I even don't like Kovalev as a person

Loma got 2 great wins - GRJ and Walters, and few average wins like Sosa and Martinez, plus he's the champ in 2 weight classes in less than 10 fights. 5 titleholders in 9 fights but he beat no one, lol ok

These are better accomplishments than beating 41 y.o veteran coming off a loss and long period of inactivity

Why you don't ask me who has Crawford or Mikey Garcia beat though? Or about Rigo, his last and only relevant fight was 4 years ago? You ask only about Lomachenko, Golovkin and Kovalev, that's why I suppose there's agenda behind your words - 90% of posters can't keep it real here

Dude what has Campillo done? Guy got steamrolled by Beatable easy.

Fact is Kovalev only has a 49 year old on his resume and aint dominate **** coz he ducked purse bid to fight Stevenson and lost to Ward, but I bet he on that list of yours.

Who said I got Mikey and Rigo in my list?

Crawford, unlike Loma, aint lost to no bum. He's unbeaten in his many more fights than Loma and he is a two division champion too.

Walters aint no great fighter wtf! Aint no one was talking about Walters before he was lined up to fight Loma, same with Sosa. No one was talking about these clowns at all, but soon as they get in the ring with Loma they are these great victories.

I literally never saw a single thread on here where people were talking about those guys before the Loma fight.

It's the same with GGG and Lemule, GGG and Monroe, etc etc. All these guys suddenly became these great fighter when they were lined up to fight these guys.

Bate and switch as usual. Take a look at the Postol situation. 'Everybody' (you know who am talkin bwt) was all about how Postol was the best at 140lbs after he beat Mathysse, how much of a skilled and technical fighter he was etc etc. Soon as Crawford took him to school, he was nothing anyway.

Wouldn't be surprised if you one of those that said Wlad would school Joshua then switched up and said he was too old etc etc and aint a great victory.