Originally posted by Raonic
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I'd Love Mayweather Rematch, I Never Lost That Fight!
Collapse
-
Last edited by TonyGe; 04-28-2017, 09:55 PM.
-
Casuals don't give a **** about Floyd outside of the ring. Floyd fights Conor in September for $100 million, and recaptures his superstardom, and then pacquiao rematch for $100 million.
Retire for good.
Both of these could easily happen if "Money" so chooses.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostEveryone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floy was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
Pac outlanded Floyd that night no doubt about that as we now live in an era were tech can be used to screen post fight videos. Pac tapped that ass and then some.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostEveryone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floy was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
Both guys snuck in some good shots that earned mutual respect. Neither guy was willing to trade.
I can understand celebrating good business, but celebrating that as a decisive win? Gtfo
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostNo it would be best for jmm to elevate Floyd cos Floyd beat him comfortably on points. Jmm would want people to know he was beaten but beaten by the best.
But let's not play games and second guess and insinuate jmmm has ulterior motive.
Jmmm thinks PAC is greater as he lost 3 times too PAC and needed 4 attempts to beat PAC. And he was taking a beating by PAC and hurti ng. Floyd never hurt jmm so no wonder jmmm feels PAC is greater. He said PAC had best attributes. Jmm may like PACs CV more also liked how he stopped his fellow Mexicans.
What you implying and jumping to conclusions that jmm should think Floyd is greater? Wishful thinking on your part. People would be more inclined to assume dlh and coitto an d hatton would think PAC is greater as he stopped them all. You only need to read best I've faced thread and it's not always as obvious as you'd think it'd be.
Don't let your personal bias complicate what is really simple.
Comment
-
#This gif shows how inaccurate compubox is and how the eyes can be fooled into thinking who hit who in real time. If you blink you won't catch the punch that really connected in this exchange. Guess who got one in? Yep, it's not floyd it's Pac as always. The right jab went in straight to Floyd's jaw. While again Floyd had to foul and push Pac's head so he can stop Pac from heating up. And as usual the hometown boy gets the point in the compubox.
Compublind, that's another way of putting this manipulation of perception.
Floyd's cowardly excuse for boxing ***** that night, was an exercise of how to rip off boxing fans with their hard earned money, set in the biggest stage of boxing ever.
The architect of the art of run and hug tactics is a recipe for an energy diffusing bore fest fight that should not be associated with the legends of the game who has given us treasures of epic battles to enjoy.
Sadly, Floyd's performance was not one of those. His was designed to create an illusion that running and hugging is enough to win a bout as long as Vegas was on his side nothing was impossible. As we now have witnessed. The biggest sports heist in history happened.
# If someone needs to redeem himself for all that *****ness it's Floyd
Last edited by Spoon23; 04-28-2017, 09:45 PM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TonyGe View PostEveryone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floyd was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
Comment
-
Originally posted by nveleven View PostFair enough. I felt like it was a fight that manny lost, but not a fight that Floyd won. Both guys had the lowest punch output of their careers. People were expecting manny to throw punches in bunches, but Floyd had a good counter strategy to neutralize the action, and effectively put the audience to sleep.
Both guys snuck in some good shots that earned mutual respect. Neither guy was willing to trade.
I can understand celebrating good business, but celebrating that as a decisive win? Gtfo
Comment
-
Comment