Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Pacquiao: I'd Love Mayweather Rematch, I Never Lost That Fight!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Raonic View Post
    There's no chance he won the fight. I can see 4-4 after 8 rounds but Floyd won the last 4 rounds.
    Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floyd was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
    Last edited by TonyGe; 04-28-2017, 09:55 PM.

    Comment


    • Casuals don't give a **** about Floyd outside of the ring. Floyd fights Conor in September for $100 million, and recaptures his superstardom, and then pacquiao rematch for $100 million.
      Retire for good.
      Both of these could easily happen if "Money" so chooses.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
        Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floy was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
        Yeah that's what most floyd lovers don't get. Manny had the least punch out put of his career that night, but Floyd was so ***** that night that he also had his least punch out put of his career for being overly defensive, and we later on found out those landed punches that was counted for floyd in the compubox which I now call compublind was a hoax, Compubox gave him a padded score card and Floyd still got his least punch output of his career lol

        Pac outlanded Floyd that night no doubt about that as we now live in an era were tech can be used to screen post fight videos. Pac tapped that ass and then some.





        Comment


        • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
          Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floy was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
          Fair enough. I felt like it was a fight that manny lost, but not a fight that Floyd won. Both guys had the lowest punch output of their careers. People were expecting manny to throw punches in bunches, but Floyd had a good counter strategy to neutralize the action, and effectively put the audience to sleep.
          Both guys snuck in some good shots that earned mutual respect. Neither guy was willing to trade.
          I can understand celebrating good business, but celebrating that as a decisive win? Gtfo

          Comment


          • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            No it would be best for jmm to elevate Floyd cos Floyd beat him comfortably on points. Jmm would want people to know he was beaten but beaten by the best.

            But let's not play games and second guess and insinuate jmmm has ulterior motive.
            Jmmm thinks PAC is greater as he lost 3 times too PAC and needed 4 attempts to beat PAC. And he was taking a beating by PAC and hurti ng. Floyd never hurt jmm so no wonder jmmm feels PAC is greater. He said PAC had best attributes. Jmm may like PACs CV more also liked how he stopped his fellow Mexicans.
            What you implying and jumping to conclusions that jmm should think Floyd is greater? Wishful thinking on your part. People would be more inclined to assume dlh and coitto an d hatton would think PAC is greater as he stopped them all. You only need to read best I've faced thread and it's not always as obvious as you'd think it'd be.
            This is far too much for me to reply to being that I frankly don't give a **** in the grand scheme of things. Floyd and Manny beat common opponents. Mayweather beat all but JMM at their optimum weights with less stipulations. No rational human being can deny that. Oh, and Mayweather beat him head to head. The argument for Manny being greater doesn't hold up under scrutiny.

            Don't let your personal bias complicate what is really simple.

            Comment


            • #This gif shows how inaccurate compubox is and how the eyes can be fooled into thinking who hit who in real time. If you blink you won't catch the punch that really connected in this exchange. Guess who got one in? Yep, it's not floyd it's Pac as always. The right jab went in straight to Floyd's jaw. While again Floyd had to foul and push Pac's head so he can stop Pac from heating up. And as usual the hometown boy gets the point in the compubox.



              Compublind, that's another way of putting this manipulation of perception.

              Floyd's cowardly excuse for boxing ***** that night, was an exercise of how to rip off boxing fans with their hard earned money, set in the biggest stage of boxing ever.

              The architect of the art of run and hug tactics is a recipe for an energy diffusing bore fest fight that should not be associated with the legends of the game who has given us treasures of epic battles to enjoy.

              Sadly, Floyd's performance was not one of those. His was designed to create an illusion that running and hugging is enough to win a bout as long as Vegas was on his side nothing was impossible. As we now have witnessed. The biggest sports heist in history happened.

              # If someone needs to redeem himself for all that *****ness it's Floyd

              Last edited by Spoon23; 04-28-2017, 09:45 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pasawayako View Post
                Most of the people in the world think that pac won. It's just here in nsb think that floyd won.
                Yeah even in Spain, they saw Pac winning. (@ 14:00 mark, BOXING EXPERTS AT THE END OF THE VIDEO ALL FOR PAC)


                Comment


                • Originally posted by TonyGe View Post
                  Everyone is entitled to their opinions. I thought Pacquiao won. I'm not trying to be controversial but that's how I saw the fight. Manny pressed the action. Before you say it wasn't effective agression because he missed a lot of punches. That's true but Mayweather missed just as much and he wasn't pressing. When I saw the fight and Lampley and company were calling punches it was obvious to me that Mayweather was missing and getting credit for them. I thought, "am I watching the same fight." By the way I thought Manny was slipping and blocking just as well as Floyd was. No credit given to Pac. It was a very very close fight.
                  I mean I didn't think it was a good performance by either but if Manny won, it'd have to be VEERYYY close for something to even make an argument. Pretty hard to definitively say Manny won.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by nveleven View Post
                    Fair enough. I felt like it was a fight that manny lost, but not a fight that Floyd won. Both guys had the lowest punch output of their careers. People were expecting manny to throw punches in bunches, but Floyd had a good counter strategy to neutralize the action, and effectively put the audience to sleep.
                    Both guys snuck in some good shots that earned mutual respect. Neither guy was willing to trade.
                    I can understand celebrating good business, but celebrating that as a decisive win? Gtfo
                    I was disappointed in both fighters. After all the build up the fight was a non event.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      PAC should have 3 wins if not for scorecard error. The fourth fight need not have happened so I don't even could t that as loss. 3 wins is better than 1 win four Floyd. So PAC is greater.



                      ,
                      dude you define the word p@ctard

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP