Dispensing the myth in advance that "nobody picked klitschko to beat joshua"
Collapse
-
But if he gets knocked out in two rounds is it fair to say he's shot? After all Wlad was knocked out in two by Sanders. Being shot will be a good excuse to take away credit where it's due don't you think. I mean, you can't win if everyone you beat is shot in retrospect.Comment
-
This is comedy gold. OP picked Wlad to win by ko in the AJ v Klitschko poll yet he makes this thread lmao.Comment
-
I just picked Wlad to KO Joshua, late...Comment
-
He's 41 years old, has been out of the ring for a year and a half and looked awful in his last fight. If a fighter ticks those boxes then it's absolutely fair to assume that he may be shot. Context mattersBut if he gets knocked out in two rounds is it fair to say he's shot? After all Wlad was knocked out in two by Sanders. Being shot will be a good excuse to take away credit where it's due don't you think. I mean, you can't win if everyone you beat is shot in retrospect.Comment
-
So therefore if Joshua wins, under any circumstances, to you it's only about Wlad being shot and he deserves no credit. Even though your picking Wlad to win? Sounds like an inbuilt dismissal of any possible credit for Joshua.Comment
-
i am still not sure how the fight will play out. Both guys are KO-artists and are supposed to be chinny, but hopefully they wont respect each others power too much like in the GGG Vs Lemieux fight.
I would rather see Joshua going for the early kill and countering Klitschkos jab with a full force right straight counter. He did the same counter in his last couple fights, but different kind of caliber.Comment
Comment