I'm waiting for the Panda guy to rate your troll skills. I predict a B+.
Who has the better resume: Broner or Duran?
Collapse
-
If ignorance was bliss this place would be Disney Land 100%
To even compare Broner to Duran in jest is weak to actually think he compares in any way shows complete ignorance when evaluating talent.
All they have are names on a record and they don't even know how to read a record in regards to "where & when" a match occurred. Willie Monroe was not an easy mark back then he traveled to Europe and lost a few "split desc." which translated means he won!
He became a trial horse and a good one and their talents and values are essential in boxing. The green fan has no knowledge of men like that they just look at an "L" on a record don't understand the real meaning of it!
Heres the dumbest statement on here.........
Duran explained by Sugar Ray Curtain......."Kinda slow and could be uncoordinated, good infighting but was chinny (got KTFO on more than one occasion). Lacked handspeed and defence". ....Yes the De Fence was shaky
and he was chinny? Yeah Duran was real chinny...hahaha.
Broner would NEVER sign to fight Duran.
I give Broner credit for how he finished his fight with Madiana but other than that he's done very little to put his name any where near ATG fighters.
HeadShots.....yes that's your problem, too many head shots for you!
Ray.Comment
-
When talking about Duran you have to specify Montreal Duran or No Mas Duran. Broner was getting handled by Maidana and got up off the canvas and finished well. Duran would've said No MasComment
-
Never in my life have I seen an uncommitted quitter get so much praise. Broner is more committed to the sport than Duran wasComment
-
-
-
Duran wouldn't of been on the canvas.. and if he was he would of got pissed and cameback only reason he quit is cause he didn't want to chase ray it was annoying to him.Comment
Comment