If Wlad Wins is AJ Exposed?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mlac
    Undisputed Champion
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2014
    • 20326
    • 1,627
    • 1,478
    • 210,093

    #31
    Originally posted by juggernaut666
    Yep,the only thing usually exposed on here is the dumbest posters,which is easily to spot just read Mlacs posts on this thread alone......lmao
    yeah saying wlad is shot is dumb lmao!

    this is coming from a greaseballed spastic that doesnt even know how to throw a punch on a heavybag that claim's

    ' AJ is already the GOAT '

    LMFAO

    Comment

    • betmen
      Indonesian
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Dec 2009
      • 4763
      • 310
      • 254
      • 28,570

      #32
      Originally posted by mlac
      What? how was Wlad shot 5-6 years ago? not a single person said he was shot going into the fury fight...

      How can you say he's shot and then say AJ deserves credit for being a shot 41 year old ex champ?

      doesnt make any sense pal.
      you and many fans have flaw in your reasoning, you thought when a fighter is shot then is over? any fighters defeat them doesnt deserve any credit, that's bullcrap!!

      wlad has been gun shy since ibragimov but wlad is a great fighter. he maybe psychally shot and gun shy but his technique, power experience and mentality in elite stage can still carry him yo defeat opponent.

      pac has been shot since margo, and more shot after ko6 but doesnt mean young fighter defeating him doesnt deserve credit because he is still A+ class fighter even after all that. same case with wlad.

      Comment

      • mlac
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Feb 2014
        • 20326
        • 1,627
        • 1,478
        • 210,093

        #33
        Originally posted by betmen
        you and many fans have flaw in your reasoning, you thought when a fighter is shot then is over? any fighters defeat them doesnt deserve any credit, that's bullcrap!!

        wlad has been gun shy since ibragimov but wlad is a great fighter. he maybe psychally shot and gun shy but his technique, power experience and mentality in elite stage can still carry him yo defeat opponent.

        pac has been shot since margo, and more shot after ko6 but doesnt mean young fighter defeating him doesnt deserve credit because he is still A+ class fighter even after all that. same case with wlad.
        No he hasnt, and no he hasnt, Pac is a faded version of his former self, a faded version that is still arguably the best/one of the best WW's in the world.....There is a difference you know..

        Wlad looked spectacular in the pulev fight...

        In the jennings fight, the decline was there to see, and in the Fury fight....he didnt throw punches?

        why?

        because fury is the gypsy re-incarnate of muhammed Ali?

        Or maybe it's because he cannot pull the trigger anymore?

        I don't even know what your arguing tbh, 'it's not over when a fighter is shot' and you should 'credit a fighter for beating a shot fighter'?

        riiight.

        Comment

        • Eff Pandas
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2012
          • 52129
          • 3,624
          • 2,147
          • 1,635,919

          #34
          No. And for future reference anyone using the term "exposed" when talking about a loss at the elite level of boxing & in a lesser sense at any level is usually just exposing themselves as a dummy.

          Comment

          Working...
          TOP