Comments Thread For: Weekend blowout seals the deal: Lomachenko is P4P's best man
Collapse
-
-
Is it just me or does Loma fans completely IGNORE the fact that he has a LOSS on his record??? I mean google, boxingrec, wiki, all show Loma with a loss to a JOURNEYMAN with a DOZEN losses ! Yet they seem to think he has NEVER lost as a pro or amateur EVER.
P4P #1's don't lose to guys not even ranked P4P top 50!Comment
-
Based on skill absolutely. Based on resume Ward is the only active fighter that's beaten other fighters on the P4P list when he fought them it. Including the P4P number 3 in KovalevLast edited by SkillspayBills; 04-11-2017, 09:29 AM.Comment
-
Not the old LUCKY excuse. Nothing Lucky about being up 80-70 and knocking Salido down 4 TIMES. How FKN dumb are you??? Are you drunk on Loma NUT???Comment
-
I mean ESPN crowned GGG number 1 p4p after having a fight as close as Ward-Kovalev with a lesser fighter in Jacobs. This double standard is really turning me off the sport.Comment
-
I just focus on the fights n fighters. Screw all the media fluffComment
-
P4P is so subjective and the fact that Ward/Kov was close and Chocolatito lost his crown kind of changes things up. I like to consider Lom as a top 5 P4P with all these guys playing musical chairs. A loss or a close fight can rearrange things for any of the top 5. It's easier just to consider Lom as a top 5. No one can argue that.Comment
-
How are anyone's lives here dramatically changed if Lom, Ward, Kov, Chocolito, GGG, Thurman, Pac, etc., are interchangeable in the top P4P rankings? It's a pointless debate. As if debating is going to fortify anything but someone's perspective in a very subjective area where bias of one kind or another is prevalent. Flip each of those guys around on a list, put their names in a hat and pick out the order of first pull...who the hell cares at the end of the day?Comment
-
Comment