I watched the GGG/Jacobs fight twice & I had Jacobs winning both times with no way GGG had a chance of winning. I think I had Jacobs winning by 2 points the first time & 3 points the second. With Ward/Kovalev I was sure Kovalev won the first time. Than I watched the fight a second time & had Ward winning by 1. I re watched it yet again & had Kovalev winning by 1. I think Ward/Kovalev was a fight that could have gone either way. But with GGG/Jacobs I really just don't see how GGG won decisively after watching it twice. For a lot of the rounds Golovkin didn't do much activity at all in them & I felt was just giving the rounds away. I'm a Golovkin fan too so it's not like I'm biased or anything against him I just feel he genuinely lost.
Does anyone else see the GGG/Jacobs decision as more of a robbery than Ward/Kovalev?
Collapse
-
-
Thought both were clear and a KD erased any doubt that even a draw was plausible. I thought Kovalev was more dominant (than GGG) and Jacobs did (than Ward) but any other interpretation than a successful defense for the champion was that you wanted the result.
Kovalev 117-110 can see 116-111. GGG 115-112 can see 116-111. -
I think a better case can be made for a Kovalev win than a Jacobs win. I had Jacobs & Kovalev winningComment
-
-
no dont be silly. they are giving him rounds for not being destroyed. thats the way you are supposed to score. ggg couldnt corner him therefore jacobs wins. put all the onus on ggg to do everything, ignore who was landing cleaner punches, and bam you got jacobs winning. do the same thing and you got ward winning. its a foolproof system. works everytime.Comment
-
Kov oulanded ward by a very small amount. Golovkin outlanded Jacobs by almost 60.
Because of knockdown Jacobs only wins if you find 7 rounds for him, which I think is a real stretch. Not crazy, but a stretch. Judges had it correct.Comment
Comment